From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ASoC: add imx-sgtl5000 machine driver working with fsl_ssi Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:02:44 -0500 Message-ID: <4F612394.4060703@freescale.com> References: <1331553537-19789-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20120314090115.GN3852@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (tx2ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.14]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A07210414F for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:02:51 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20120314090115.GN3852@pengutronix.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Sascha Hauer Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Shawn Guo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mark Brown List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Sascha Hauer wrote: > What are the next steps here? Now we have fsl_ssi.c and imx-ssi.c, one > for dt bindings and the other one for platform bindings and also AC97 > support. They should probably get merged some day which might be a bit > difficult since currently I don't see the platform users moving over > to devicetree and the seem to be no AC97 users in powerpc. I don't have any problem with adding AC97 support to fsl_ssi.c, assuming it's not a huge mess. I don't know enough about AC97 to know how easy that is, though. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: timur@freescale.com (Timur Tabi) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:02:44 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v4] ASoC: add imx-sgtl5000 machine driver working with fsl_ssi In-Reply-To: <20120314090115.GN3852@pengutronix.de> References: <1331553537-19789-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20120314090115.GN3852@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <4F612394.4060703@freescale.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Sascha Hauer wrote: > What are the next steps here? Now we have fsl_ssi.c and imx-ssi.c, one > for dt bindings and the other one for platform bindings and also AC97 > support. They should probably get merged some day which might be a bit > difficult since currently I don't see the platform users moving over > to devicetree and the seem to be no AC97 users in powerpc. I don't have any problem with adding AC97 support to fsl_ssi.c, assuming it's not a huge mess. I don't know enough about AC97 to know how easy that is, though. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale