From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
To: Ying Han <yinghan-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Zhu Yanhai <zhu.yanhai-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: What's the progress of per cgroup background reclaim?
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:09:12 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F614138.10609@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALWz4iyqyQD3g27J=wLvQ=WN0enXLB3rmHDAb51UJaLPJDz5BA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
(2012/03/15 1:17), Ying Han wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Zhu Yanhai <zhu.yanhai-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Just a quick question, could you please tell me what's the current
>> status of the development of per cgroup background reclaim? This topic
>> seems to be silent after Han Ying's patchset V7
>> (http://lwn.net/Articles/440073/) and Kame's async reclaim patchset V3
>> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/26/20), and I can't find it in
>> memcg-devel tree either.
>> Is anyone still working on this?
>
> There were some discussions on going w/ per-memcg kswapd thread or
> workqueue by that time. And now I think we agree to go w/ the
> per-memcg thread model.
I think agreed, too.
Thanks,
-Kame
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-15 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-14 7:53 What's the progress of per cgroup background reclaim? Zhu Yanhai
[not found] ` <CAC8teKW9Yry114+B06XiFbOtamwS6fNLzrKYo8PZazjEzMCiNQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-14 8:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-14 16:17 ` Ying Han
[not found] ` <CALWz4iyqyQD3g27J=wLvQ=WN0enXLB3rmHDAb51UJaLPJDz5BA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-15 1:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-03-15 3:12 ` Zhu Yanhai
[not found] ` <CAC8teKUrJ_ufkhtVAnsv-gzHfYmp8agY_bncOYS7mEdiqD+YZA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-15 16:31 ` Ying Han
[not found] ` <CALWz4iwO+eGFW23qVwjy=MKufRtiVck08pJphSij226pjTQiBw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-19 8:09 ` Zhu Yanhai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F614138.10609@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu-+cum20s59erqfuhtdcdx3a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yinghan-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=zhu.yanhai-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.