From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.dynamicdevices.co.uk ([89.200.136.37]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S8EBp-0000Wx-BH for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:10:13 +0100 Received: from cpc9-live20-0-0-cust612.know.cable.virginmedia.com ([82.42.142.101] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by www.dynamicdevices.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S8E32-0007o1-7D for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:01:08 +0000 Message-ID: <4F622053.50202@dynamicdevices.co.uk> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:01:07 +0000 From: Alex J Lennon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4F610B38.5060309@dynamicdevices.co.uk> <4F6219FC.7010506@dynamicdevices.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: oe-core layer including support for i.MX28 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:10:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >However, you should be able to base your work on that and keep doing rebases against this branch Will do. What's the view/policy on adding custom board implementations into these layers? e.g. I'm about to start taking a look at an i.MX51 based screen unit. Various machine parameters are different including SDRAM settings, so I'll probably end up with a new machine, imx51gem or some such, much as I did with my imx28evk based "gem" in oe-classic. Is the the new machine target and associated recipes, kernel+patches something that I should expect to be able to merge back into meta-fsl-arm at some point? Thanks / Best Regards, Alex On 15/03/2012 16:53, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 13:34, Alex J Lennon > wrote: >>> I am working on that; my current work in progress can be seen at >>> https://github.com/OSSystems/meta-fsl-arm >> Thanks for that. I had a quick go ad building and as you say I saw bitbake >> fails as it's trying to build up a patched linux-imx kernel. >> >> "include/linux/pagemap.h: In function 'fault_in_pages_readable':" > I fixed the branch right now and you ought to be able to build using it. > >> Maybe the best way for me to proceed would be to put in a pull request on >> your wip-imx28 branch and see if I can add my oe-classic imx28 specifics >> into the copy? > I'll do the pull request but only after I get it properly done. > There're some missing things on it and some work to be done. However, > you should be able to base your work on that and keep doing rebases > against this branch (be prepared to fix some conflicts on the way). >