From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt: pinctrl: Document device tree binding Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:12:57 -0600 Message-ID: <4F622319.5060402@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1331316873-20052-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <20120314212616.GR12083@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Tony Lindgren , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , B29396@freescale.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, dongas86@gmail.com, shawn.guo@linaro.org, thomas.abraham@linaro.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 03/15/2012 10:51 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: ... > Hm, both you guys agree, then I will be happy that we merge this. > Acked-by: Linus Walleij Great. I'll repost a new version very soon based on the feedback (just a couple of grammar issues and an added example). > Since it's just toching DT dirs I guess it should go through Grant, > but I'm happy to take it in pinctrl too. I've seen many bindings go through the tree for the subsystem they correspond to, as part of the series that implements them. I'm not bothered either way though - I'll let you work this out with Grant once I post the final version. (I'm hoping to post the actual implementation today, maybe tomorrow)