From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.dynamicdevices.co.uk ([89.200.136.37]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S8Eaa-0001AM-Qv for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:35:48 +0100 Received: from cpc9-live20-0-0-cust612.know.cable.virginmedia.com ([82.42.142.101] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by www.dynamicdevices.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S8ERn-0007p9-NM for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:26:43 +0000 Message-ID: <4F622652.30001@dynamicdevices.co.uk> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:26:42 +0000 From: Alex J Lennon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4F610B38.5060309@dynamicdevices.co.uk> <4F6219FC.7010506@dynamicdevices.co.uk> <4F622053.50202@dynamicdevices.co.uk> <20120315181021.56883348@eb-e6520> <4F6223D4.3020100@dynamicdevices.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: oe-core layer including support for i.MX28 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:35:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >That said, I do believe you ought to check if your changes cannot be made generic Will try to keep in mind. >Please complain at them ... this is the only way to revert it. I'll keep on at them :) Anything not to have to go back to LTIB... ;) Alex On 15/03/2012 17:21, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 14:16, Alex J Lennon > wrote: >>> I think the first solution is better and that custom boards should be added >>> to custom layers >> Hmmm ok, thanks That being the case it may be better for me to migrate my >> recipes from >> the oe-classic codebase into a new layer created from scratch. It'll be >> quicker and easier for >> me that way but perhaps less generic. > I think many things can be merged back but it is better to have custom > boards in specific layers that inherit meta-fsl-arm. That said, I do > believe you ought to check if your changes cannot be made generic > (ofthenly it can be done) and this could allow it to be merged here. > >> (Although my understanding was that Freescale have no intention of providing >> Linux support related >> to OpenEmbedded at this time? Or at least that's what they are telling me >> :) > Please complain at them ... this is the only way to revert it. Some > individuals are working with OpenEmbedded/Yocto and it might end > changing the Freescale's position if we can enough community support > and complains at them :-) >