From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: Switch to srcu-less get_dirty_log()
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:30:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F62EC25.5060306@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120316155511.70455b4a.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
On 03/16/2012 02:55 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:03:48 +0800
> Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> For my quickly review, mmu_lock can not protect everything, if the guest page
>
> Yes and ...
>
>> is written out of the shadow page/ept table, dirty page will be lost.
>
> No.
>
>>
>> There is a example:
>>
>> CPU A CPU B
>> guest page is written by write-emulation
>>
>> hold mmu-lock and see dirty-bitmap
>> is not be changed, then migration is
>> completed.
>
> We do not allow this break.
>
Hmm? what can avoid this? Could you please point it out?
>>
>> call mark_page_dirty() to set dirty_bit map
>>
>>
>> Right?
>
>
> As you pointed out, we cannot assume mutual exclusion by mmu_lock.
> That is why we are using atomic bitmap operations: xchg and set_bit.
>
> In this sense we are at least guaranteed to get the dirty page
> information in dirty_bitmap - the current one or next one.
>
The problem is the guest page is written before dirty-bitmap is set,
we may log the dirty page in this window like above case...
> So what we should care about is to not miss the information written in
> the next bitmap at the time we actually migrate the guest.
>
Actually, the way log dirty page in MMU page-table is tricky:
set dirty-bitmap
allow spte to be writeable
page can be written
That means we always set dirty-bitmap _before_ page become dirty that is
the reason why your bitmap-way can work.
> Actually the userspace stops the guest at the final stage and then send the
> remaining pages found in the bitmap. So the above break between write and
> mark_page_dirty() cannot happen IIUC.
>
Maybe i'd better firstly understand why "We do not allow this break" :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-16 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-01 10:30 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: srcu-less dirty logging -v2 Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-01 10:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: MMU: Split the main body of rmap_write_protect() off from others Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-12 7:39 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-12 7:52 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-01 10:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: Avoid checking huge page mappings in get_dirty_log() Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-02 2:56 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-02 5:11 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-12 18:04 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-13 9:20 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-13 10:12 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-13 23:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-14 1:04 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-14 5:34 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-14 10:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-01 10:33 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: Switch to srcu-less get_dirty_log() Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-03 5:21 ` [PATCH 3/4 changelog-v2] " Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-06 11:15 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-06 14:43 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-06 15:01 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-06 15:23 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-06 15:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-07 8:07 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-07 23:25 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-08 1:35 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-09 0:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-12 12:05 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-07 8:18 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-07 23:20 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-16 5:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] " Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-16 6:55 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-16 7:30 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-03-16 7:55 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-16 8:28 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-16 9:44 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-19 9:34 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-19 10:15 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-01 10:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: Remove unused dirty_bitmap_head and nr_dirty_pages Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-03 5:12 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: srcu-less dirty logging -v2 Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-20 14:43 ` Avi Kivity
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-23 11:33 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: srcu-less dirty logging Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-02-23 11:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: Switch to srcu-less get_dirty_log() Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-02-28 11:46 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-29 7:49 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-02-29 9:25 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-29 10:16 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-02-29 12:27 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-29 14:18 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F62EC25.5060306@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.