Re: [PATCH] mmc: mmci: assume maintainership

[Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>]

On 03/16/2012 09:53 AM, Russell King wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:48:07AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> Although, right know I would vote for having a more active maintainer
>> for MMCI; please no offense Russell, I realize that your are fully
>> occupied with a lot of other cool stuff. I think Linus could play a
>> great role in this; especially since he also will be able to test
>> patches on many different ARM boards.
>
> No, I explained why I haven't applied your other patches, and I explained
> at the time my concerns with your patches which zero out and restore the
> power and clock registers.  I repeated those concerns several times but
> the issue never got resolved.
>
> So that gives me no other option than to slow down applying your patches.
> It's not that I'm not being responsive.  It's that I'm purposely being
> slow over these changes because comments on the patches don't seem to be
> hitting home.
>

Then I totally misunderstood you. I did send you an explanation to why 
the registers could be zeroed out, which you did not respond to.

Moreover, I did not receive any comments/acks on the other patches. Are 
you only looking at the first one in a patch series or do you mean that 
the other onces looks OK? If so, I can definitely try to rebase the 
series and move the power management patches later in serie... Just tell 
me and I will do it!


Br
Ulf Hansson