From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34152) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S8flg-0004k2-5u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:37:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S8fle-00086W-I2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:37:03 -0400 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:55468) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S8fle-00086C-Ak for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:37:02 -0400 Message-ID: <4F63C08A.1070903@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 02:36:58 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1331933677-29628-1-git-send-email-mjt@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <1331933677-29628-4-git-send-email-mjt@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4F63BAD4.9070106@redhat.com> <4F63BC09.1060507@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4F63BEB3.9040803@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4F63BEB3.9040803@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv5 03/11] rewrite iov_* functions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel , Anthony Liguori On 17.03.2012 02:29, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 16/03/2012 23:17, Michael Tokarev ha scritto: >>>>>> test-iov.c | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> >>>> Makefile changes missing. >> *sigh* Which changes? >> >> I'm sorry but i ran past any sane time limits for this long ago. >> >> Come on, which ANOTHER changes do you guys need for all this TRIVIAL stuff ??? >> Can you describe in a few words please? > > Changes to tests/Makefile that build test-iov.c and run it with "make > check". Thank you for the information. That's about 4 lines of makefile code. Should I generate a v6 of the patchset for these 4 lines? Should this test be runnable on windows, do I need to introduce a mult-platform unix socket emulation support to run this test? Besides, should the test be run always, verifying the result of memcpy() using memcmp(), just in case if some byte flipped in transit? Anything else needs a rewrite? /mjt