From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11E9E013A5 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:14:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Mar 2012 10:14:24 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="122565162" Received: from unknown (HELO envy.home) ([10.7.199.162]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Mar 2012 10:14:24 -0700 Message-ID: <4F676946.6000609@intel.com> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:13:42 -0700 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120209 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Stewart, David C" References: <90741FE9B50D654690EB940EDB456C8E0908E7@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <1332152778.9740.3.camel@ted> <90741FE9B50D654690EB940EDB456C8E091117@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto weekly bug trend charts -- WW11 X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:14:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/19/2012 09:18 AM, Stewart, David C wrote: >> From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >> bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Jiajun >> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 8:33 AM >> BTW, when I check the open bug data, I find that a new variable is introduced >> with new bugzilla for field "severity" - janitors. We do not include the bugs >> marked as janitors in "Yocto Weekly Open bug Trend(Severity)". My thinking >> is that janitors is similar with enhancement. We could treat it as >> enhancement(with weight value "0"), or if we think it should be included into >> WDD, we could set a weight value for it. How do you think of it? >> Fortunately, we only have 4 bugs marked as janitors, and they are all new >> reported last week. We could simply update the bug trend once we make the >> decision. > > I suggest we make the janitor severity the same as low in the WDD calculation. > I don't know what "low" would map to. The key says: "The weight we use for each severity: Critical:10, Major:7, Normal:5, Minor:3, Enhancement:0 " In my view, Janitors should be marked the same as Enhancement, 0. If a bug is important enough to track and impact release, it shouldn't be a janitors bug, which by definition are intended to sit in a pool for new-comers and irregular contributors to pick up. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel