From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@google.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stable@kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: what happened with dccaf33fa37 "ext4: flush any pending end_io requests before DIO" for 3.0?
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:21:51 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F676B2F.8040209@msgid.tls.msk.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFgt=MCXRzLx+s1mthr1oD=Pj=HQ5kxnOdbtX8Q9=wSeZ41u2w@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 880 bytes --]
19.03.2012 21:10, Jiaying Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Jan Kara<jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>> On Sat 17-03-12 13:31:30, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>> Ping?
>>>
>>> Maybe just a one-line reply isn't THAT difficult?
> Sorry for the slow response. I am not sure what happened to this patch.
> Ted, do you know what we need to do to get this patch to the
> stable release?
For reference, attached is the version I use locally since last August.
...
>>>>> There was one more ext4 commit at that time, which made its way into
>>>>> stable but this one did not.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if the reason for that was the fact that it needed a small
>>>>> "backport" for 3.0, since in 3.1+ the code has been moved into another
>>>>> file, and the context is slightly different. In that case, attached
>>>>> is the "backport" which we use with 3.0.x since that time.
Thanks,
/mjt
[-- Attachment #2: ext4-flush-any-pending-end_io-requests-before-DIO-reads-w-dioread_nolock-dccaf33fa3.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2055 bytes --]
(backported to 3.0 by mjt)
upstream_commit dccaf33fa37a1bc5d651baeb3bfeb6becb86597b
Author: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Date: Fri Aug 19 19:13:32 2011 -0400
ext4: flush any pending end_io requests before DIO reads w/dioread_nolock
There is a race between ext4 buffer write and direct_IO read with
dioread_nolock mount option enabled. The problem is that we clear
PageWriteback flag during end_io time but will do
uninitialized-to-initialized extent conversion later with dioread_nolock.
If an O_direct read request comes in during this period, ext4 will return
zero instead of the recently written data.
This patch checks whether there are any pending uninitialized-to-initialized
extent conversion requests before doing O_direct read to close the race.
Note that this is just a bandaid fix. The fundamental issue is that we
clear PageWriteback flag before we really complete an IO, which is
problem-prone. To fix the fundamental issue, we may need to implement an
extent tree cache that we can use to look up pending to-be-converted extents.
Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
diff --git a/fs/ext4/indirect.c b/fs/ext4/indirect.c
index b8602cd..0962642 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -3507,12 +3507,17 @@ ssize_t ext4_ind_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb *iocb,
}
retry:
- if (rw == READ && ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode))
+ if (rw == READ && ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode)) {
+ if (unlikely(!list_empty(&ei->i_completed_io_list))) {
+ mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
+ ext4_flush_completed_IO(inode);
+ mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
+ }
ret = __blockdev_direct_IO(rw, iocb, inode,
inode->i_sb->s_bdev, iov,
offset, nr_segs,
ext4_get_block, NULL, NULL, 0);
- else {
+ } else {
ret = blockdev_direct_IO(rw, iocb, inode,
inode->i_sb->s_bdev, iov,
offset, nr_segs,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-19 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-30 20:38 what happened with dccaf33fa37 "ext4: flush any pending end_io requests before DIO" for 3.0? Michael Tokarev
2012-02-28 11:42 ` Michael Tokarev
2012-03-17 9:31 ` Michael Tokarev
2012-03-19 16:42 ` Jan Kara
2012-03-19 17:10 ` Jiaying Zhang
2012-03-19 17:21 ` Michael Tokarev [this message]
2012-03-28 22:22 ` Greg KH
2012-03-19 17:21 ` Greg KH
2012-03-19 17:30 ` Jiaying Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F676B2F.8040209@msgid.tls.msk.ru \
--to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jiayingz@google.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@google.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.