From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp2.nedap.com ([213.160.213.92] helo=smtp.nedap.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S9wrQ-0004kq-MP for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:04:16 +0100 Received: from nvs0066.nedap.local (10.91.8.1) by relaysmtp1.nedap.local (10.1.8.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.83.0; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:55:23 +0100 X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <32b1850f001458e9@nedap.com> Received: from [10.2.40.10] ([10.2.40.10]) by nedap.com ([10.91.8.1]) with ESMTP (TREND IMSS SMTP Service 7.1) id 32b1850f001458e9 ; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:55:27 +0100 Message-ID: <4F68621B.4000909@nedap.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:55:23 +0100 From: Jaap de Jong User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120216 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org" References: <4F62FFB7.5070401@nedap.com> <4F6756A9.7020106@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <4F6756A9.7020106@windriver.com> Subject: Re: remove dbg and dev packages X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:04:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/19/2012 04:54 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 3/16/12 3:54 AM, Jaap de Jong wrote: >> Hi! >> >> is there an option (in local.conf?) to not build (or not add to the >> repository of) the dbg and dev packages? > You have to build the dev packages, otherwise you can't (cross) compile the > software in the development environment. Clear! > The dbg packages are optional, but if you disable them then things may or may > not be stripped and the filesizes on the target may increase. (It's been a > while since I tried it w/o dbg packages...) Don't want that. > Is there a reason why you don't want the dev and dbg packages to be generated? > They should only be installed onto a target filesystem if you've requested them > (or a package has a dependency on them). Normal, non-dev, filesystems shouldn't > be installed any of those components... if they are, there is a packaging bug in > something. The only simple reason is to keep the repository's and the Packages* files smaller. Thanks for your comments!