From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:45:45 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 0/6] AT91 drivers Kconfig cleanup In-Reply-To: <7104123.IANagkT9hm@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> References: <7104123.IANagkT9hm@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> Message-ID: <4F69B159.5030101@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/15/2012 05:50 PM, Dmitry Torokhov : > On Thursday, March 15, 2012 04:57:16 PM Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> This is a series which deals with AT91 drivers Kconfig entries. Its goal is >> to remove too restrictive dependencies on SoC names. >> This will allow to add support for newer SoC seamlessly. >> >> One question remains: should I submit those patches through dedicated >> sub-maintainer's git trees or can I queue the whole series in arm-soc? > > I'm fine if you queue input piece through arm-soc. Ok, good: I have "Acknowledgement" by several maintainers: so yes, I will send this series via arm-soc. Is this means that I can add your "Acked-by"? Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758484Ab2CUKqa (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:46:30 -0400 Received: from newsmtp5.atmel.com ([204.2.163.5]:51760 "EHLO sjogate2.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758278Ab2CUKq3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:46:29 -0400 Message-ID: <4F69B159.5030101@atmel.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:45:45 +0100 From: Nicolas Ferre Organization: atmel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Torokhov CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ludovic.desroches@atmel.com, mpm@selenic.com, herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, vinod.koul@intel.com, a.zummo@towertech.it Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] AT91 drivers Kconfig cleanup References: <7104123.IANagkT9hm@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> In-Reply-To: <7104123.IANagkT9hm@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/15/2012 05:50 PM, Dmitry Torokhov : > On Thursday, March 15, 2012 04:57:16 PM Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> This is a series which deals with AT91 drivers Kconfig entries. Its goal is >> to remove too restrictive dependencies on SoC names. >> This will allow to add support for newer SoC seamlessly. >> >> One question remains: should I submit those patches through dedicated >> sub-maintainer's git trees or can I queue the whole series in arm-soc? > > I'm fine if you queue input piece through arm-soc. Ok, good: I have "Acknowledgement" by several maintainers: so yes, I will send this series via arm-soc. Is this means that I can add your "Acked-by"? Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre