From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"aliguori@us.ibm.com" <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] RTC: New logic to emulate RTC
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 01:42:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F6A757B.4020503@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E0A3FB5@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Il 22/03/2012 01:23, Zhang, Yang Z ha scritto:
> Actually, I also see some failures during testing. And most of them
> are fail to pass the 244us update cycle checking. Since we are in
> emulation environment, we cannot ensure it always greater than 244us.
> So I think it should not be a bug.
Yes, that's fine. But I also see some cases in which the first upgrade
cycle after divider reset is not reported. The second, 1.5 seconds
after divider reset, is fine.
Paolo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "aliguori@us.ibm.com" <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/7] RTC: New logic to emulate RTC
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 01:42:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F6A757B.4020503@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E0A3FB5@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Il 22/03/2012 01:23, Zhang, Yang Z ha scritto:
> Actually, I also see some failures during testing. And most of them
> are fail to pass the 244us update cycle checking. Since we are in
> emulation environment, we cannot ensure it always greater than 244us.
> So I think it should not be a bug.
Yes, that's fine. But I also see some cases in which the first upgrade
cycle after divider reset is not reported. The second, 1.5 seconds
after divider reset, is fine.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-22 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-19 6:13 [PATCH v4 0/7] RTC: New logic to emulate RTC Zhang, Yang Z
2012-03-19 6:13 ` [Qemu-devel] " Zhang, Yang Z
2012-03-20 12:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-03-20 12:18 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2012-03-22 0:23 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2012-03-22 0:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Zhang, Yang Z
2012-03-22 0:42 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-03-22 0:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-03-22 3:03 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2012-03-22 3:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Zhang, Yang Z
2012-03-22 3:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-03-22 3:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2012-03-22 3:06 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2012-03-22 3:06 ` [Qemu-devel] " Zhang, Yang Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F6A757B.4020503@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.