From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Attilio Rao Subject: Re: Build failure in OVMF Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:48:44 +0000 Message-ID: <4F6B3BCC.9080704@citrix.com> References: <1332425282.8817.82.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1332425282.8817.82.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Keir Fraser , "Tim (Xen.org)" , "g@phlegethon.org" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 22/03/12 14:08, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 13:58 +0000, Keir Fraser wrote: > >> On 22/03/2012 13:15, "Tim Deegan" wrote: >> >> >>> At 13:07 +0000 on 22 Mar (1332421679), Attilio Rao wrote: >>> >>>> Actually CONFIG_OVMF should be disabled by default, can you please check >>>> how is in your case? >>>> >>> whitby:xen-unstable.hg$ grep CONFIG_OVMF Config.mk >>> CONFIG_OVMF ?= $(CONFIG_Linux) >>> >>> changeset: 25077:6bf50858c3c5 >>> user: Attilio Rao >>> date: Thu Mar 22 10:26:03 2012 +0000 >>> summary: Fetch the OVMF repository from specific git mirror and enable >>> it >>> >>> >>>> Also, did you apply the OVMF v4 patch for enabling the CONFIG_OVMF on? >>>> >>> Nope, AFAICT I have no local patches. >>> >> I applied the OVMF-enable patch this morning, hence Tim's problem. I might >> have applied v3 rather than v4 though? Please check. >> > I think that was supposed to be an RFC pending a build fix getting > committed to OVMF upstream. > > Yes, we need v4 which also contains explicit showstopping informations based on a OVMF patch pending. Thus, likely we should revert v3 inclusion, wait another couple of days for Tianocore people to reply, eventually push the tianocore patch in our mirror and in the end apply v4. Attilio