From: Marko Ristola <marko.ristola@kolumbus.fi>
To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Various nits, fixes and hacks for mantis CA support on SMP
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 20:16:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F6CBE07.6040904@kolumbus.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120302232136.GB31447@uio.no>
03.03.2012 01:21, Steinar H. Gunderson kirjoitti:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:42:19AM +0200, Marko Ristola wrote:
>> I'm not happy with I2CDONE busy looping either.
>> I've tried twice lately to swith into I2C IRQ, but those patches have caused I2CDONE timeouts.
>
> Note that there are already timeouts with the current polling code, but they
> are ignored (my patch makes them at least be printed with verbose=5). I can't
> immediately recall if it's on RACK, DONE or both.
I think that occasional timeouts belong to the picture (RACK missing means: packet lost).
If I2CDONE comes immediately when I2C command has been emitted,
it is a driver software bug (some earlier I2C command).
>
>> Do my following I2C logic thoughts make any sense?
>
> Well, note first of all that I know next to nothing about I2C, and I've never
> seen any hardware documentation on the Mantis card (is there any?). But
> generally it makes sense to me, except that I've never heard of the demand of
> radio silence for 10 ms before.
Ok. Radio silence for 10 ms isn't your problem: when you have a FE_LOCK,
10 ms requirement is no more relevant.
>
>> There might be race conditions, that the driver possibly manages:
>> 1. If two threads talk into DVB frontend, one could turn off the I2C gate, while the other is talking to DVB frontend.
>> This would case lack of I2CRACK: only way to recover would be to turn
>> the I2C gate on, and then redo the I2C transfer.
>
> Note that I've tried putting mutexes around the I2C functions, and it didn't
> help on the I2C timeouts; however, that was largely on a single-character
> level, so it might not be enough. (You can see these mutexes being commented
> out in my patch.)
I have now a new idea for what to try with I2C interrupts.
It all depends, whether I understand the driver coding well enough.
>
> /* Steinar */
I have also a low interest for Mantis coding:
Ideas come fast, and if the new code doesn't work right away,
I back up the code somewhere and drop it.
Some years ago during Summer Holiday time I could get something done
and even patches got applied into Linux kernel.
Marko Ristola
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-23 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-28 1:03 [PATCH] Various nits, fixes and hacks for mantis CA support on SMP Steinar H. Gunderson
2012-02-28 1:45 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2012-03-02 22:42 ` Marko Ristola
2012-03-02 23:21 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2012-03-23 18:16 ` Marko Ristola [this message]
2012-03-19 14:05 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-19 14:07 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2012-03-19 14:19 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-03-22 12:41 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-22 21:11 Ninja
2012-04-01 13:41 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F6CBE07.6040904@kolumbus.fi \
--to=marko.ristola@kolumbus.fi \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.