From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] i.MX6: mx6q_sabrelite: add SATA bindings
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:17:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F6EF0CA.6050002@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F6E363D.8080804@boundarydevices.com>
On 24/03/2012 22:01, Eric Nelson wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 03/24/2012 01:19 AM, stefano babic wrote:
>> Am 24/03/2012 08:09, schrieb Dirk Behme:
>>> Hi Stefano,
>>
>> Hi Dirk,
>>
>>> On 13.03.2012 17:59, Eric Nelson wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson<eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>
>>>
>>> Should this patch go into your u-boot-imx.git -next?
>>
>> mmhh...in patchworks this is marked as "Changes requested" - I do not
>> remember now why, but I have a couple of open questions rereading the
>> patch...
>>
> Funny how that happens with time.
Well, it is not a case ;-). I scan regularly patchwork and I check for
not worked patches - however, if a patch is in "Changes requested", I
expect a new version and I do not care about it. Dirk's message let me
convince that the patch was not deeply reviewed and I checked it again.
So many thanks to Dirk.
>
>>>> diff --git a/board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/mx6qsabrelite.c
>>>> b/board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/mx6qsabrelite.c
>>>> index 1d09a72..5915159 100644
>>>> --- a/board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/mx6qsabrelite.c
>>>> +++ b/board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/mx6qsabrelite.c
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>> + u32 reg = 0;
>>>> + s32 timeout = 100000;
>>>> + struct imx_ccm_reg *const imx_ccm
>>>> + = (struct imx_ccm_reg *) CCM_BASE_ADDR;
>>>> + struct iomuxc_base_regs *const iomuxc_regs
>>>> + = (struct iomuxc_base_regs *) IOMUXC_BASE_ADDR;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Enable sata clock */
>>>> + reg = readl(&imx_ccm->CCGR5); /* CCGR5 */
>>>> + reg |= MXC_CCM_CCGR5_CG2_MASK;
>>>> + writel(reg,&imx_ccm->CCGR5);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Enable PLLs */
>>>> + reg = readl(&imx_ccm->analog_pll_enet);
>>>> + reg&= ~BM_ANADIG_PLL_SYS_POWERDOWN;
>>>> + writel(reg,&imx_ccm->analog_pll_enet);
>>>> + reg |= BM_ANADIG_PLL_SYS_ENABLE;
>>>> + while (timeout--) {
>>>> + if (readl(&imx_ccm->analog_pll_enet)&
>>>> BM_ANADIG_PLL_SYS_LOCK)
>>>> + break;
>>>> + }
>>>> + if (timeout<= 0)
>>>> + return -1;
>>>> + reg&= ~BM_ANADIG_PLL_SYS_BYPASS;
>>>> + writel(reg,&imx_ccm->analog_pll_enet);
>>>> + reg |= BM_ANADIG_PLL_ENET_ENABLE_SATA;
>>>> + writel(reg,&imx_ccm->analog_pll_enet);
>>
>> Is it all this part really board specific or mx6 specific ? I would like
>> to split this part into a common and a board specific parts, and making
>> the common part available for other boards.
>>
>
> This is all generic MX6 SATA enablement and could be moved into
> common code.
>
> Is cpu/armv7/mx6/clock.c the right place?
>
> How about routine named 'enable_sata_clock()'?
ok, agree.
>
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Enable sata phy */
>>>> + reg = readl(&iomuxc_regs->gpr[13])
>>>> +& (IOMUXC_GPR13_SDMA_STOP_REQ
>>>> + |IOMUXC_GPR13_CAN2_STOP_REQ
>>>> + |IOMUXC_GPR13_CAN1_STOP_REQ
>>>> + |IOMUXC_GPR13_ENET_STOP_REQ);
>>
>> Why do you need to touch CAN bits ?
>>
> Not touching them, just keeping them the way they are and
> clearing out the rest (which are all SATA fields).
Then these three are superfluous, are not they ? You read the register,
and putting in "or" with IOMUXC_GPR13_CANx_STOP_REQ does nothing.
Why do you not use clrsetbits to change the sata bits ?
>
> Perhaps this would be clearer:
> reg = readl(&iomuxc->gpr[13])
> & ~(IOMUXC_GPR13_SATA_PHY_8_MASK
> |IOMUXC_GPR13_SATA_PHY_7_MASK
> |IOMUXC_GPR13_SATA_PHY_6_MASK
> |IOMUXC_GPR13_SATA_SPEED_MASK
> |IOMUXC_GPR13_SATA_PHY_5_MASK
> |IOMUXC_GPR13_SATA_PHY_4_MASK
> |IOMUXC_GPR13_SATA_PHY_3_MASK
> |IOMUXC_GPR13_SATA_PHY_2_MASK
> |IOMUXC_GPR13_SATA_PHY_1_MASK);
>
> Or better yet, maybe a macro in iomux-v3.h:
clrsetbits does exactly what you want, I think.
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
--
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de
=====================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-25 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-March/#119234>
2012-03-13 16:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] i.MX6: mx6q_sabrelite: add SATA bindings Eric Nelson
2012-03-14 14:53 ` Dirk Behme
2012-03-15 8:28 ` Stefano Babic
2012-03-15 9:34 ` Liu Hui-R64343
2012-03-15 9:58 ` Stefano Babic
2012-03-24 7:09 ` Dirk Behme
2012-03-24 8:19 ` stefano babic
2012-03-24 21:01 ` Eric Nelson
2012-03-25 10:17 ` Stefano Babic [this message]
2012-03-25 15:33 ` Eric Nelson
2012-03-24 20:41 ` Eric Nelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F6EF0CA.6050002@denx.de \
--to=sbabic@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.