All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Yu <raise.sail@gmail.com>
To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: remove useless update for flag parameter in tcp_enter_frto_loss()
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:54:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F72B589.5060903@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADVnQymQaCSKx0aRda6OiP=t2OToxHmvjXjYvTdxsq7oFE3DTg@mail.gmail.com>

于 2012年03月28日 13:29, Neal Cardwell 写道:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Li Yu<raise.sail@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>> It seem that we forget remove below two lines after copying code :)
>>
>> This update never impacts others.
>
> The 'flag' variable will be used in later iterations of the
> tcp_for_write_queue() loop. The comment seems to quite sensibly
> indicate that the FLAG_DATA_ACKED bit is being set to avoid entering
> that branch of the if statement in later segments in the loop:
>
> 2168                 if ((tp->frto_counter == 1)&&  !(flag&  FLAG_DATA_ACKED)) {
> 2169                         /* For some reason this R-bit might get cleared? */
> 2170                         if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked&  TCPCB_SACKED_RETRANS)
> 2171                                 tp->retrans_out += tcp_skb_pcount(skb);
> 2172                         /* ...enter this if branch just for the
> first segment */
> 2173                         flag |= FLAG_DATA_ACKED;
> 2174                 } else {
>
> The structure of the logic seems intact from the original commit that
> added this:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=d1a54c6a0a3f9c2c4ef71982d89b8571bd9eaa51
>

Sorry for spent time on this, it it account for F-RTO retransmitted
segment here.

Yu

> neal
>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-28  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-28  4:23 [PATCH] tcp: remove useless update for flag parameter in tcp_enter_frto_loss() Li Yu
2012-03-28  5:27 ` Yuchung Cheng
2012-03-28  5:29 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-03-28  6:54   ` Li Yu [this message]
2012-03-28  7:34     ` Eric Dumazet
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-28  4:00 Li Yu
2012-03-28  4:17 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F72B589.5060903@gmail.com \
    --to=raise.sail@gmail.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.