[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ti/master

[Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>]

Hi Tom,

Le 30/03/2012 02:58, Tom Rini a ?crit :
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>  wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> Le 29/03/2012 20:01, Tom Rini a ?crit :
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Tom Rini<trini@ti.com>    wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> The following changes since commit
>>>> 4a3ea216414ad762b3718775a65437c13f0accbc:
>>>>   Rob Herring (1):
>>>>         ARM: highbank: setup env from boot source register
>>>>
>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>
>>>>   git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti master
>>>>
>>>> Anatolij Gustschin (2):
>>>>       board/ti/beagle/beagle.c: Fix build warnings
>>>>       arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/clocks-common.c: Fix build warnings
>>>>
>>>> Tom Rini (3):
>>>>       sdrc.c: Fix typo in do_sdrc_init() for SPL
>>>>       OMAP: Remove omap1610inn-based boards
>>>>       OMAP: Move omap1510inn to Unmaintained / Orphaned
>>>
>>>
>>> Well this is embarrassing.  I'd have sworn I tested -s omap but I must
>>> not have as omap1510inn doesn't build after that change as it doesn't
>>> build as there's no such thing as arch/arm/cpu/arm925t/omap/.  Please
>>> drop that change out, sorry for the noise.
>>
>>
>> Hmm... I would not expect omap1510inn to build after it has been orphaned,
>> so I am unsure what you mean exactly here. Also, can you precisely list the
>> change(s) that I should drop?
>
> So, omap1510inn has no active maintainer, it's listed as the same as
> omap1610inn which was not building.  omap1510inn was however building
> until 'OMAP: Move omap1510inn to Unmaintained / Orphaned' in which I
> also added it to the omap SoC family, forgetting that it also forced
> trying to build a non-existent directory, breaking it.

Ok, throwing out 'OMAP: Move omap1510inn to Unmaintained / Orphaned' 
from u-boot-arm/master.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.