From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com (comal.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.152]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC08E0044D for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:17:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dlep26.itg.ti.com ([157.170.170.121]) by comal.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id q2UMHL0r005356; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:17:21 -0500 Received: from DFLE70.ent.ti.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dlep26.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2UMHLYB009989; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:17:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by dfle70.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:17:21 -0500 Received: from gtwmills.gt.design.ti.com (gtwmills.gt.design.ti.com [158.218.100.52]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2UMHK0O021598; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:17:20 -0500 Message-ID: <4F7630F0.8010408@ti.com> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:17:20 -0400 From: William Mills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/3.1.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Koen Kooi References: <20120319205854.GE19810@bill-the-cat> <20120319210247.GD15554@denix.org> <20120319210557.GF19810@bill-the-cat> <788A3D57-ACFD-4CA0-820F-0DD91DCB8196@dominion.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: <788A3D57-ACFD-4CA0-820F-0DD91DCB8196@dominion.thruhere.net> Cc: Tom Rini , meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: release branch for meta-ti? X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:17:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/30/2012 06:09 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 19 mrt. 2012, om 14:05 heeft Tom Rini het volgende geschreven: > >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 05:02:47PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 01:58:54PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: >>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 01:58:36PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Any volunteers for maintaining a releasebranch that matches the upcoming oe-core release in ~4 weeks? >>>> >>>> If Denys or Chase don't step-up, I'll do it. As qualification, I do >>>> such a thing for oe-classic currently :) But if either of them would >>>> rather, I'll defer to them. >>> >>> We'll probably need to set meta-oe-maintenance up anyway for meta-arago to >>> work with, rather than chasing changes in the master... >> >> Yes, meta-oe will also need a maintenance release to match > > meta-oe branch is really close to having a maintainer, what's the (final) word on the meta-ti branch? I have no objection to the branch to ensure the current working functionality remains working with yocto maintenance releases. However, I don't think we should actively maintain new features on both branches. So what is the goal of the branch?