All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RAID5 XOR speed vs RAID6 Q speed (was Re: AVX RAID5 xor checksumming)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:38:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F76ECD0.1060608@anonymous.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1333057458-2986-1-git-send-email-james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com>

On 29/03/2012 22:44, Jim Kukunas wrote:
> Based on xor_speed, the AVX implementation appears to be ~32% faster than the
> SSE implementation on my i7 2600:
>
> 	generic_sse: 15088.000 MB/sec
> 	avx: 19936.000 MB/sec

I just noticed in my logs the other day (recent el5 kernel on a Core 2):

raid5: automatically using best checksumming function: generic_sse
    generic_sse:  7805.000 MB/sec
raid5: using function: generic_sse (7805.000 MB/sec)
raid6: int64x1   2635 MB/s
raid6: int64x2   3208 MB/s
raid6: int64x4   3020 MB/s
raid6: int64x8   2519 MB/s
raid6: sse2x1    5099 MB/s
raid6: sse2x2    5742 MB/s
raid6: sse2x4    8237 MB/s
raid6: using algorithm sse2x4 (8237 MB/s)

I was just wondering how it's possible to do the RAID6 Q calculation 
faster than the RAID5 XOR calculation - or am I reading this log excerpt 
wrongly?

It's probably academic, since the machine this is running on only has a 
maximum of about 4500 MB/s of memory throughput, and a lot of that would 
be consumed sending data to disc in amongst the calculations being done.

Cheers,

John.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-31 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-29 21:44 AVX RAID5 xor checksumming Jim Kukunas
2012-03-29 21:44 ` [PATCH] raid5: add AVX optimized RAID5 checksumming Jim Kukunas
2012-03-31 11:38 ` John Robinson [this message]
2012-04-02  0:01   ` RAID5 XOR speed vs RAID6 Q speed (was Re: AVX RAID5 xor checksumming) H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-02 22:48   ` Jim Kukunas
2012-04-03 10:23     ` John Robinson
2012-04-03 23:56       ` Jim Kukunas
2012-04-03 23:56         ` [PATCH 1/2] crypto: wait for a full jiffy in do_xor_speed Jim Kukunas
2012-04-03 23:56         ` [PATCH 2/2] crypto: disable preemption while benchmarking RAID5 xor checksumming Jim Kukunas
2012-04-06 20:43         ` RAID5 XOR speed vs RAID6 Q speed (was Re: AVX RAID5 xor checksumming) Dan Williams
2012-04-17 15:32           ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-04-17 15:32             ` Boaz Harrosh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F76ECD0.1060608@anonymous.org.uk \
    --to=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.