From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53496) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SEc6U-0000JI-GO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 03:55:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SEc6O-0002rX-DC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 03:55:06 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57876 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SEc6O-0002rN-7l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 03:55:00 -0400 Message-ID: <4F795B52.9060803@suse.de> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 09:54:58 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20120330152436.GA31016@aepfle.de> <4F772590.2000603@suse.de> <20120331164627.GA23873@aepfle.de> In-Reply-To: <20120331164627.GA23873@aepfle.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu/configure: fix CFLAGS handling for i386 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Olaf Hering Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Erik Blake , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 31.03.2012 18:46, schrieb Olaf Hering: > On Sat, Mar 31, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >=20 >> This is the only usage of +=3D outside Makefile fragments, so I wonder= if >> its use may have been by accident. Is it safe in a POSIX context? >> Or should we better use CFLAGS=3D"$CFLAGS -march=3D486"? >=20 > Now that I look at the shebang, configure is a sh script and +=3D is mo= st > likely a bash feature. So your suggestion for the assignment is correct= . ...apart from the missing i in i486, obviously. ;) Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] qemu/configure: fix CFLAGS handling for i386 Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 09:54:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4F795B52.9060803@suse.de> References: <20120330152436.GA31016@aepfle.de> <4F772590.2000603@suse.de> <20120331164627.GA23873@aepfle.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120331164627.GA23873@aepfle.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org To: Olaf Hering Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Erik Blake , qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Am 31.03.2012 18:46, schrieb Olaf Hering: > On Sat, Mar 31, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >=20 >> This is the only usage of +=3D outside Makefile fragments, so I wonder= if >> its use may have been by accident. Is it safe in a POSIX context? >> Or should we better use CFLAGS=3D"$CFLAGS -march=3D486"? >=20 > Now that I look at the shebang, configure is a sh script and +=3D is mo= st > likely a bash feature. So your suggestion for the assignment is correct= . ...apart from the missing i in i486, obviously. ;) Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg