From: Mike Dunn <mikedunn@newsguy.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@parrot.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] MTD: flash drivers set ecc strength
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:34:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F79E314.609@newsguy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN8TOE_BxgTMJb0beyDC17jcmavmuz0WGvLw3NbJRCiuvB4VnA@mail.gmail.com>
Brian,
I was just reviewing things and realized that I accidentally ignored one of your
comments...
On 03/29/2012 10:24 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
>>
>> case NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH:
>> @@ -3384,6 +3385,8 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>> pr_warn("BCH ECC initialization failed!\n");
>> BUG();
>> }
>> + chip->ecc.strength =
>> + chip->ecc.bytes*8 / fls(8*chip->ecc.size);
>
> Isn't this spacing against coding style? I'd suggest spaces around the
> '*'. Also, after a few minutes, I have no idea where this calculation
> comes from. But I'm not familiar with SOFT_BCH. Maybe a comment is in
> order?
I'm no bch expert myself (ping, Ivan), but I believe this is correct, and it is
consistant with the equations used to determine the 't' parameter (i.e.,
ecc_strength) from nand_bch_init() in drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bch.c. (BTW,
currently only nandsim uses SOFT_BCH.) As for coding style... honestly, I
mostly just rely on checkpatch.pl, but I'll check the style guide document.
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-02 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-11 21:21 [PATCH 0/4] MTD: Change meaning of -EUCLEAN return code on reads Mike Dunn
2012-03-11 21:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] MTD: add ecc_strength fields to mtd structs Mike Dunn
2012-03-13 12:25 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-11 21:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] MTD: flash drivers set ecc strength Mike Dunn
2012-03-13 12:27 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-16 14:13 ` Ivan Djelic
2012-03-16 20:02 ` Mike Dunn
2012-03-29 17:24 ` Brian Norris
2012-03-31 0:05 ` Mike Dunn
2012-04-02 17:34 ` Mike Dunn [this message]
2012-04-03 8:03 ` Ivan Djelic
2012-03-11 21:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] MTD: euclean_threshold added to mtd_info and sysfs Mike Dunn
2012-03-13 12:29 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-11 21:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] MTD: drivers return max_bitflips, mtd returns -EUCLEAN Mike Dunn
2012-03-14 11:05 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-03-14 11:45 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-03-29 17:30 ` Brian Norris
2012-03-30 12:13 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-31 1:17 ` Mike Dunn
2012-04-02 7:17 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-02 15:33 ` Mike Dunn
2012-03-31 1:05 ` Mike Dunn
2012-03-31 6:37 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-04-02 16:40 ` Mike Dunn
2012-04-03 8:48 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-04-13 15:54 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-13 18:18 ` Mike Dunn
2012-03-13 12:03 ` [PATCH 0/4] MTD: Change meaning of -EUCLEAN return code on reads Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-13 17:46 ` Mike Dunn
2012-03-13 22:14 ` Mike Dunn
2012-03-14 10:56 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F79E314.609@newsguy.com \
--to=mikedunn@newsguy.com \
--cc=David.Woodhouse@intel.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=ivan.djelic@parrot.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.