From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4F7AA402.3040803@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:17:22 +0200 From: Philippe Gerum MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Is it compulsory to apply the PREEMPT_RT patch (to Linux) when running Xenomai on the top of it? List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: xenomai@xenomai.org On 04/03/2012 08:56 AM, Anisha Kaul wrote: > Greetings, > >> From "Life with Adeos": > http://www.xenomai.org/documentation/branches/v2.3.x/pdf/Life-with-Adeos-= rev-B.pdf > >> Both the real=ADtime nucleus and the Linux kernel should handle the case= where a high priority thread is kept from running because a low priority o= ne holds a contended resource> for a possibly unbounded amount of time. Xe= nomai provides this support, but only the PREEMPT_RT variant does so for th= e Linux kernel. For this reason, Xenomai keeps an >> eye and provides support for the current developments of PREEMPT_RT, alb= eit the mainline kernel still remains the system of reference for now. > > > I don't understand whether the above quote implies that it necessary > to apply the PREEMPT_RT patch (to Linux) when working with Xenomai on > Linux? > Please guide. > No. > -Anisha > > _______________________________________________ > Xenomai-help mailing list > Xenomai-help@domain.hid > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help > --=20 Philippe.