From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363A1E0137C for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 05:46:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q34CkTE9011050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 4 Apr 2012 05:46:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.146.67] (128.224.146.67) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 05:46:29 -0700 Message-ID: <4F7C429E.3000809@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 08:46:22 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Robert P. J. Day" References: In-Reply-To: Cc: Yocto discussion list Subject: Re: should the dev docs match the dev yocto source? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:46:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12-04-04 05:29 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > just noticed that BSP guide suggests 3.0 is the preferred linux > kernel, while the source itself is now up to 3.2. should those match? > this is for *development* streams of both. Not necessarily. It depends on the target. We haven't moved everything to 3.2 yet. It should probably say something more generic that choosing one of the last two yocto validated kernels is the preferred starting point. Cheers, Bruce > > rday >