From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.de>
To: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs/extent_io.c: return -ENOMEM instead of BUG_ON on allocation failure in set_extent_bit if __GFP_WAIT is set in the mask
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 09:29:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F7C4CC8.7060007@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F76B15D.9010801@gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/31/2012 03:25 AM, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
> If __GFP_WAIT is set in the mask, set_extent_bit should return
> -ENOMEM to its caller to decide what to do on allocation failure,
> instead of BUG_ON.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1
> deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index
> b67814c..fd2411e 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++
> b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -720,7 +720,8 @@ int
> set_extent_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start, u64 end,
> again: if (!prealloc && (mask & __GFP_WAIT)) { prealloc =
> alloc_extent_state(mask); - BUG_ON(!prealloc); + if (!prealloc) +
> return -ENOMEM; }
>
> spin_lock(&tree->lock);
Hi Sheng-Hui -
Do you have a follow-on series to this? With the exception of the
set_extent_dirty call in end_bio_extent_readpage, every set_extent_bit
caller uses GFP_NOFS, which includes __GFP_WAIT. If we return a
failure here, we need to catch the failure in the call sites.
Otherwise, the failure will just be ignored and we'll end up with an
inconsistent extent state tree.
- -Jeff
- --
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=Pxwh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-04 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-31 7:25 [PATCH] btrfs/extent_io.c: return -ENOMEM instead of BUG_ON on allocation failure in set_extent_bit if __GFP_WAIT is set in the mask Wang Sheng-Hui
2012-04-04 13:29 ` Jeff Mahoney [this message]
2012-04-05 2:10 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2012-04-05 2:10 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F7C4CC8.7060007@suse.de \
--to=jeffm@suse.de \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shhuiw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.