From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44429) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFSYo-0008Vh-8P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:55:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFSYm-0003CT-45 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:55:49 -0400 Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:26990) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFSYl-0003Bo-Uy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:55:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4F7C6F0D.4000203@citrix.com> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:55:57 +0100 From: Julien Grall MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F7AAC02.6090606@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4F7AAC02.6090606@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Memory: unify ioport registration List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Julian Pidancet , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Anthony Liguori , Stefano Stabellini On 04/03/2012 08:51 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 04/02/2012 05:37 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > >> s = g_malloc0(sizeof(SerialState)); >> >> @@ -820,8 +828,9 @@ SerialState *serial_init(int base, qemu_irq irq, int baudbase, >> >> vmstate_register(NULL, base,&vmstate_serial, s); >> >> - register_ioport_write(base, 8, 1, serial_ioport_write, s); >> - register_ioport_read(base, 8, 1, serial_ioport_read, s); >> + portio_list_init(serial_port_list, serial_portio_list, s, "serial-io"); >> + portio_list_add(serial_port_list, get_system_io(), base); >> + >> > Should we just remove serial_init() and replace it with the serial-isa > QOM class? > After few researchs, it's seems this function is not used in the source code. Is that right ?