From: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] Add 'patman' patch generation, checking and submission script
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 18:38:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F7C78F8.8060304@keymile.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPnjgZ20QcG+tnNL45QSfVLqxJMB1HMUVbb4LjymTWgbaWBFDA@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/04/2012 06:16 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Gerlando,
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Gerlando Falauto
> <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com> wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> OK I haven't tried it yet, but this sounds awesome.
>> I wonder how people manage to send and rework their patches without such
>> tool. Even one single patchset has been giving me strong enough headaches so
>> far, not to mention the massive waste of time.
>
> Yes I wrote it when I had to do a few revisions of a relatively small
> series. It was very difficult and time-consuming to get everything
> right for submission. Now it is mostly automatic.
>
>>
>> I pretty much agree with Albert, this should eventually move out of u-boot.
>> But you need to start somewhere, and this is perhaps a good testbed to get
>> people to use it. I believe it should perhaps eventually be integrated into
>> git as it makes for a wonderful enhancement (or wrapper) over git
>> format-patch and git send-email.
>
> Yes, the only thing that would need to be sorted out is the hooks for
> checkpatch.
Wouldn't something in ~/.gitconfig do the trick?
>> As I said I haven't tested it yet, but I would like to contribute a couple
>> questions / suggestions for enhancements out of your README:
>>
>> 1) Marking the test setup commits using tags as well. Something like
>>
>> Series-exclude: true
>>
>> I mean, I tend to forget (and make mistakes) pretty easily. Not having to
>> remember that a given commit is for testing only makes it more difficult for
>> me to go wrong. Even that extra "-s1" I could easily miss... Also, it
>> *might* be also useful to have those test commits somewhere in the middle of
>> the patch series, perhaps.
>
> Yes I think that is useful, and it fits with the idea of not needed
> any args in the normal case. I will stick it on the list.
>
>>
>> 2) Do you think it would be possible to write the cover letter on a commit
>> of its own? I believe git doesn't allow you to create a commit not touching
>> any file, but perhaps one might find some way arount it as well.
>
> You can put it in any commit, and in principle in its own commit, but
> 'git rebase -i' doesn't like empty commits in my experience.
>
>> Maybe the cover letter itself could be written as an added file to such
>> commit, and then tagged with something like:
>>
>> Cover-letter-file: wonderfulpatchset.txt
>>
>> This might turn out useful, as one could easily edit the file while
>> reworking the patchset from the top commit, and then attribute it to such
>> commit, wherever it is located in the tree.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> Easy to do - I wonder if it might be better to commit that file to a
> separate commit (which is marked Series-exclude:). Otherwise you have
> a dangling file that might hang around for weeks and is very
> vulnerable to accidents.
You mean not committing the cover letter file being the alternative?
I believe you definitely *don't* want files hanging (not under revision
control) anywhere, at any time. At least, _I don't_.
So the cover letter commit could contain all the needed information,
(like recipients, revision etc) including a file with the text of the
cover letter. Having it marked as Series-exclude (or whatever) would
just not count it as a patch file to send out.
Not quite sure whether it's trivial to deal with the numbering though.
>> Thanks again for the tool!
>
> Thanks for looking at it. We will see if this goes into U-Boot this time.
Thanks,
Gerlando
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
>>
>> Gerlando
>>
>>
>> On 01/15/2012 02:12 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> What is this?
>>> =============
>>>
>>> This tool is a Python script which:
>>> - Creates patch directly from your branch
>>> - Cleans them up by removing unwanted tags
>>> - Inserts a cover letter with change lists
>>> - Runs the patches through checkpatch.pl and its own checks
>>> - Optionally emails them out to selected people
>>>
>>> It is intended to automate patch creation and make it a less
>>> error-prone process. It is useful for U-Boot and Linux work so far,
>>> since it uses the checkpatch.pl script.
>>>
>>> It is configured almost entirely by tags it finds in your commits.
>>> This means that you can work on a number of different branches at
>>> once, and keep the settings with each branch rather than having to
>>> git format-patch, git send-email, etc. with the correct parameters
>>> each time. So for example if you put:
>>>
>> [...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-04 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-15 1:12 [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] Add 'patman' patch generation, checking and submission script Simon Glass
2012-01-15 1:20 ` Simon Glass
2012-02-03 19:00 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-02-03 19:30 ` Simon Glass
2012-02-03 20:00 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-02-05 5:46 ` Simon Glass
2012-02-12 13:55 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-04-04 10:35 ` Gerlando Falauto
2012-04-04 16:16 ` Simon Glass
2012-04-04 16:38 ` Gerlando Falauto [this message]
2012-04-04 16:43 ` Simon Glass
2012-04-21 15:26 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F7C78F8.8060304@keymile.com \
--to=gerlando.falauto@keymile.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.