From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: Fix exposure of ARM_EXYNOS4210_CPUFREQ Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 09:39:30 -0700 Message-ID: <4F7C7942.2000006@samsung.com> References: <20120213094940.GA15338@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4F3CF3DA.7000806@samsung.com> <20120216160250.GP13673@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <00aa01ccf084$93c98a70$bb5c9f50$%kim@samsung.com> <20120327074931.GK5611@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4F73B3E1.4080807@samsung.com> <20120404145204.GA24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120404145917.GB1929@redhat.com> <20120404150353.GB24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HoFXZhZsNbI05u0VvPXTItHD1ZsX4sT9znVPw5O11yg=; b=fSNN8jTQeSqeTKavL3x5FjBQbPbnrc7AesgFP8MBHmIybHJjz8AF7y+xgmjnrK/a57 ur+1Md6L2Vd/1+tIv3yh4RIOHuzu1ePjX1Ld6iVQeN3kQOtKyPf+vzmJgbSbUx2vvy22 zvCzQHDSkAdxlYhuUY9CuXcPi0yfMHyIMl/MfhQio7vAjyGv4WEic9hc3Y2OHPoHwOY7 2e1Whd/8EIBO2EjzqqihaZnn8+FDoana7vdytVmwslXPpbvxsoXBnHo2LdQk44ja+NLf FJf87fRgJ3/toZI5xvfUeQQwLsQ1Y+r4mnqb5mfyvx70Lbupft1uI9/qUNzOP3cwVsVX qG3g== In-Reply-To: <20120404150353.GB24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: 'Dave Jones' , Kukjin Kim , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org On 04/04/12 08:03, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:59:17AM -0400, 'Dave Jones' wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 03:52:04PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 05:59:13PM -0700, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> > > Russell King wrote: >> > >> As predicted, this is breaking other ARM platforms. Please fix this >> > >> yourself before your crappy code gets pushed into mainline. Thanks. >> > >> >> > > I fixed it. >> > >> > When will we see patches or the fix in mainline? >> >> Just send it to Linus directly. > > 'it'... well, that implies that someone already has a patch. I've asked > Kukjin to fix the problem which he introduced because exynos is getting > rather complicated, and he'll know what the dependencies should be. So > far I've yet to see any kind of patch fixing this stuff. > Well, I already submitted its fix and it was including your e-mail. See below. http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg03080.html > Meanwhile I'm seeing failing randconfig builds for non-exynos ARM for > about a week due to the lack of dependencies. > Yeah, the failure from cpufreq exynos4x12 and exynos5250 has been introduced from last merge window and you know exynos4210 has been fixed by your patch last time. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 09:39:30 -0700 Subject: [CPUFREQ] Fix exposure of ARM_EXYNOS4210_CPUFREQ In-Reply-To: <20120404150353.GB24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20120213094940.GA15338@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4F3CF3DA.7000806@samsung.com> <20120216160250.GP13673@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <00aa01ccf084$93c98a70$bb5c9f50$%kim@samsung.com> <20120327074931.GK5611@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4F73B3E1.4080807@samsung.com> <20120404145204.GA24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120404145917.GB1929@redhat.com> <20120404150353.GB24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <4F7C7942.2000006@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/04/12 08:03, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:59:17AM -0400, 'Dave Jones' wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 03:52:04PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 05:59:13PM -0700, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> > > Russell King wrote: >> > >> As predicted, this is breaking other ARM platforms. Please fix this >> > >> yourself before your crappy code gets pushed into mainline. Thanks. >> > >> >> > > I fixed it. >> > >> > When will we see patches or the fix in mainline? >> >> Just send it to Linus directly. > > 'it'... well, that implies that someone already has a patch. I've asked > Kukjin to fix the problem which he introduced because exynos is getting > rather complicated, and he'll know what the dependencies should be. So > far I've yet to see any kind of patch fixing this stuff. > Well, I already submitted its fix and it was including your e-mail. See below. http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg03080.html > Meanwhile I'm seeing failing randconfig builds for non-exynos ARM for > about a week due to the lack of dependencies. > Yeah, the failure from cpufreq exynos4x12 and exynos5250 has been introduced from last merge window and you know exynos4210 has been fixed by your patch last time. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.