Re: Do we have a package that installs the kernel headers and config into the target?

[Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>]

On 04/06/2012 04:12 AM, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
> Cui, Dexuan wrote on 2012-04-06:
>> Darren Hart wrote on 2012-04-06:
>>> On 04/05/2012 09:41 PM, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
>>> While I understand there are valid use cases, I think this is generally
>>> contrary to workflow of the project. We build the OS, it runs on the
>>> target. This is building a general purpose OS, and then having it build
>>> itself out more. It doesn't feel like an embedded workflow.
> BTW, my question might be simplified as:
> If we strictly follow the rule the target OS shouldn't build itself out
> more, why do we supply a recipe core-image-sato-sdk.bb that can
> create an image with tools-sdk that includes development tools
> like gcc? :-)
> 
> Or, while we recommend the common embedded workflow, we
> also somewhat support (or tolerate) the way "the target builds
> itself out more"?
> 

Yup, agree.


-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel