From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, drepper@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2)
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 09:14:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F7F1659.5090305@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVxJT_WJYjecpZMGkyUrbE5gNROX1tOfFAcD84-hoPsypxcFQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/06/2012 02:54 AM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
> I agree, this particular changelog may be somewhat out of line.
>
> But I find it little hypocritical that kernel developers add CONFIG_PROC_FS,
> fix compilation problems associated with it, do not mount proc by default,
> do not mark it unmountable somehow and
> then say procless setups aren't worth it.
>
Aren't worth *optimizing for*. But yes, CONFIG_PROC_FS is pretty much a
historic relic at this point, and probably should just be dropped.
> Without proc knowledge about fdtable is gathered linearly and still unreliable.
> With nextfd(2), even procful environments could lose several failure branches.
What? Please explain how on Earth this would "lose several failure
branches."
New system calls are not something that should be added lightly...
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-06 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-01 12:57 [PATCH] nextfd(2) Alexey Dobriyan
2012-04-01 13:58 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-04-01 21:30 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-04-02 0:09 ` Alan Cox
2012-04-02 8:38 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-04-02 9:26 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-04-01 15:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-01 21:31 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-04-01 21:36 ` Alan Cox
2012-04-01 17:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-01 18:28 ` Valentin Nechayev
2012-04-01 21:33 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-04-01 19:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-01 21:35 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-04-01 22:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-04 12:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-01 22:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-01 22:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-02 0:08 ` Alan Cox
2012-04-30 9:58 ` Valentin Nechayev
2012-04-02 1:19 ` Kyle Moffett
2012-04-02 1:19 ` Kyle Moffett
2012-04-02 1:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-02 11:37 ` Ulrich Drepper
2012-04-06 9:54 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-04-06 9:54 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-04-06 15:27 ` Colin Walters
2012-04-06 16:14 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-04-06 20:16 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-04-06 20:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-06 21:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-12 10:54 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-04-12 10:54 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-04-12 11:11 ` Alan Cox
2012-04-12 11:11 ` Alan Cox
2012-04-12 13:35 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-04-12 13:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-12 19:21 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-04-12 14:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-04-06 16:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-07 21:21 ` Ben Pfaff
2012-04-11 0:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-11 0:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-11 0:09 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-11 17:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-11 18:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-11 18:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-11 18:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-11 19:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-11 19:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-11 19:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-11 20:23 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-11 20:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-17 18:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-11 18:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-11 19:20 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-11 19:20 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-11 19:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-11 19:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-11 19:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-11 19:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-11 19:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-02 23:17 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-02 23:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-04 11:51 ` Ulrich Drepper
2012-04-04 16:38 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-04 16:43 ` Ulrich Drepper
2012-04-04 17:07 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-04 17:49 ` Ulrich Drepper
2012-04-04 18:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-04 16:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-04 17:10 ` Colin Walters
2012-04-04 17:25 ` Colin Walters
2012-04-04 23:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-04 18:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-03 19:21 ` Colin Walters
2012-04-04 3:01 ` Al Viro
2012-04-04 17:10 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F7F1659.5090305@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=drepper@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.