From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7240DE00596 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 13:46:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Apr 2012 13:46:49 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="87060559" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.159]) ([10.255.12.159]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Apr 2012 13:46:49 -0700 Message-ID: <4F834AB9.8060907@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:46:49 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joshua Lock References: <4F7F2AA5.2010400@linux.intel.com> <4F801898.2060107@freyther.de> <4F833F34.5050901@linux.intel.com> <4F834601.6020507@gmail.com> <4F8347A1.3050007@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4F8347A1.3050007@linux.intel.com> Cc: poky@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Edison Next X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:46:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/09/2012 01:33 PM, Joshua Lock wrote: > > > On 09/04/12 13:26, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: >> On 09/04/2012 3:57 PM, Joshua Lock wrote: >>> "Q: What is the overall support plan for the Yocto Project? >>> >>> A: Security patches and critical bug fixes are supplied one release >>> back. No toolchain or kernel changes are allowed for these updates. >>> Support for longer periods of time can be supplied by commercial OSVs." >> >> Random Question: >> >> The above FAQ is a tad vague... what if the kernel or toolchain change >> is a security fix? > > That's a reasonable question, but not one I can answer with any > authority, having not authored the FAQ. > > I infer that it means toolchain or kernel *version* changes, as we > strive to avoid breaking compatibility with any existing layers, etc. > when providing a stable release update. > Joshua is correct, we should update the FAQ to state "Major Version" changes to toolchain or kernel. If there is a CVE that is addressed by a patch or maintence update we will ensure those get in. Sau! Yocto Project User Space > Regards, > Joshua