From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] cgroup: get rid of populate for memcg Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:44:03 +0900 Message-ID: <4F839E73.1000204@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1334010994-23301-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1334010994-23301-3-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1334010994-23301-3-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Glauber Costa Cc: Tejun Heo , netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko (2012/04/10 7:36), Glauber Costa wrote: > The last man standing justifying the need for populate() is the > sock memcg initialization functions. Now that we are able to pass > a struct mem_cgroup instead of a struct cgroup to the socket > initialization, there is nothing that stops us from initializing > everything in create(). > > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa > CC: Tejun Heo > CC: Li Zefan > CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki > CC: Johannes Weiner > CC: Michal Hocko Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki