From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4F83FB2B.8040502@domain.hid>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:19:39 +0200
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4F50A422.50208@domain.hid> <4F55C306.8020307@domain.hid>
	<4F55D765.7040705@domain.hid> <4F55E390.8090706@domain.hid>
	<4F55FE81.6000904@domain.hid> <4F560A6C.2080306@domain.hid>
	<4F560B76.5080606@domain.hid> <4F5629D2.50304@domain.hid>
	<4F562B53.7070400@domain.hid> <4F562EC2.6040604@domain.hid>
	<4F56387B.40702@domain.hid> <4F575BA3.7060404@domain.hid>
	<4F576622.1030509@domain.hid> <4F57A567.7030008@domain.hid>
	<4F7C127D.2010400@domain.hid> <4F7C1484.5090406@domain.hid>
	<4F7C183F.5040009@domain.hid> <4F7F0D4E.8080906@domain.hid>
	<4F7F0E8A.70702@domain.hid> <4F7F20F0.9070007@domain.hid>
	<4F80BD10.2060200@domain.hid> <4F83F2C3.50704@domain.hid>
	<4F83F321.2030300@domain.hid> <4F83F645.7040402@domain.hid>
	<4F83F828.4000508@domain.hid> <4F83FB24.9070104@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <4F83FB24.9070104@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] preemptive doesn't work
List-Id: Xenomai life and development <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/options/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: Roberto Bielli <roberto.bielli@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org

On 04/10/2012 11:19 AM, Roberto Bielli wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
> 
> the steps for supporting imx25 have been:
> 1. We buy a board with imx25
> 2. Our supplier made the porting of linux 2.6.31 freescale with  imx25
> 3. we put a xenomai  2.5.6 and we have adapted for imx25. The only 
> changes is this (because imx25 registers are identical to mx3 ):
> 
> old:
> #define timer_is_v2()    (cpu_is_mx3() || cpu_is_mx5())
> 
> new:
> #define timer_is_v2()    (cpu_is_mx3() || cpu_is_mx25() || cpu_is_mx5())
> 

Yes, but if you use the unchanged adeos patch, it uses if (cpu_is_mx3())
in tsc and timer code, whereas it should use if (timer_is_v2()),
timer_is_v2 is not present in vanilla linux code.

-- 
                                                                Gilles.