From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Chapman Subject: Re: [v2] Re: [RFC] l2tp/ipv6: support for L2TPv2 over UDP over IPv6 Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:47:39 +0100 Message-ID: <4F840FCB.9050504@katalix.com> References: <20120214223112.GB6806@kvack.org> <1329282410.2555.31.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4F3B6C26.4090701@katalix.com> <4F632FB6.9010206@katalix.com> <20120319032807.GD11293@kvack.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Dumazet , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Benjamin LaHaise Return-path: Received: from katalix.com ([82.103.140.233]:54765 "EHLO mail.katalix.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752741Ab2DJKrm (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:47:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120319032807.GD11293@kvack.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 19/03/12 03:28, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:19:02PM +0000, James Chapman wrote: >> Hi Ben, >> >> Do you have an updated patch to test? > > Yes, here's an updated version. We've tested this in several L2TP environments - looks good. Will you be submitting a version soon? We have additional patches ready for review which add IPv6 for L2TPv3, applying on top of your L2TPv2 patch. We also have a patch for iproute2 to add support for unmanaged L2TPv3 ethernet pseudowires over IPv6. They can be posted when your L2TPv2 patch is submitted, or as an RFC if you aren't ready to submit your patch yet. James