From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:55:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dns0.mips.com ([12.201.5.70]:44978 "EHLO dns0.mips.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1903711Ab2DJTzK (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:55:10 +0200 Received: from exchdb01.mips.com (exchhub01.mips.com [192.168.36.84]) by dns0.mips.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3AJt3RD000793; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:55:04 -0700 Received: from [192.168.65.146] (192.168.65.146) by exchhub01.mips.com (192.168.36.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.270.1; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:55:03 -0700 Message-ID: <4F849017.1020706@mips.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:55:03 -0700 From: Leonid Yegoshin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergei Shtylyov CC: "Steven J. Hill" , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add MIPS64R2 core support. References: <1333987461-822-1-git-send-email-sjhill@mips.com> <4F841E48.7000104@mvista.com> <4F848576.6040204@mips.com> <4F848957.6000400@mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <4F848957.6000400@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EMS-Proccessed: 6LP3oGfGVdcdb8o1aBnt6w== X-EMS-STAMP: JZicped5NMrwp5B8YHUqBQ== X-archive-position: 32928 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: yegoshin@mips.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Return-Path: On 04/10/2012 12:26 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > >>>> +config 64BIT_PHYS_ADDR >>>> + bool "Kernel supports 64 bit physical addresses" if EXPERIMENTAL >>>> + depends on 64BIT > >>> This option is selected on 32-bit CPUs like Alchemy, which has >>> 36-bit physical address. It will cause a warning about unmet > >> Just verified - selected Alchemy and DB1000 board and got > >> # CONFIG_64BIT is not set >> CONFIG_64BIT_PHYS_ADDR=y >> CONFIG_ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y >> CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y > >> ??? > > And you didn't get a warning on "select 64BIT_PHYS_ADDR"? Strange, > modern Kconfig should spit out one... > OK, you right, I missed it in bunch of another. It has sense to add a missed dependency. - Leonid. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dns0.mips.com ([12.201.5.70]:44978 "EHLO dns0.mips.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1903711Ab2DJTzK (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:55:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4F849017.1020706@mips.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:55:03 -0700 From: Leonid Yegoshin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add MIPS64R2 core support. References: <1333987461-822-1-git-send-email-sjhill@mips.com> <4F841E48.7000104@mvista.com> <4F848576.6040204@mips.com> <4F848957.6000400@mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <4F848957.6000400@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Return-Path: To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: "Steven J. Hill" , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org Message-ID: <20120410195503.jGmQ5hPgKWxEw8ts9pfo3Gk3_MAY3S9obRsPPsipZJQ@z> On 04/10/2012 12:26 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > >>>> +config 64BIT_PHYS_ADDR >>>> + bool "Kernel supports 64 bit physical addresses" if EXPERIMENTAL >>>> + depends on 64BIT > >>> This option is selected on 32-bit CPUs like Alchemy, which has >>> 36-bit physical address. It will cause a warning about unmet > >> Just verified - selected Alchemy and DB1000 board and got > >> # CONFIG_64BIT is not set >> CONFIG_64BIT_PHYS_ADDR=y >> CONFIG_ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y >> CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y > >> ??? > > And you didn't get a warning on "select 64BIT_PHYS_ADDR"? Strange, > modern Kconfig should spit out one... > OK, you right, I missed it in bunch of another. It has sense to add a missed dependency. - Leonid.