From: Kang Kai <Kai.Kang@windriver.com>
To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] mq_timedreceive:5-2: reduce the timeout to be compared
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:27:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F85407A.9050204@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F853592.1010407@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 2012年04月11日 15:41, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 12:02 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>
>> We use (newtime-oldtime) to compare with the TIMEOUT here,
>> but the diff-time we get here is not accurate, the restrict
>> comparing is not reasonable.
>
> Anyone can help reviewing or testing?
Test Yocto Linux 1.2 on arch x86-64 ppc and mips PASS.
Regards,
Kai
>
> Thanks,
> Wanlong Gao
>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao<gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> .../conformance/interfaces/mq_timedreceive/5-2.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/mq_timedreceive/5-2.c b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/mq_timedreceive/5-2.c
>> index e81d8d5..93421c0 100644
>> --- a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/mq_timedreceive/5-2.c
>> +++ b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/mq_timedreceive/5-2.c
>> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
>>
>> #define NAMESIZE 50
>> #define BUFFER 40
>> -#define TIMEOUT 3
>> +#define TIMEOUT 2
>>
>> int blocking;
>> void exit_handler(int signo)
>> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ int main()
>> sigemptyset(&act.sa_mask);
>> sigaction(SIGABRT,&act, 0);
>>
>> - ts.tv_sec = time(NULL) + TIMEOUT;
>> + ts.tv_sec = time(NULL) + TIMEOUT + 1;
>> ts.tv_nsec = 0;
>> oldtime = time(NULL);
>> mq_timedreceive(mqdes, msgrv, BUFFER, NULL,&ts);
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
> monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
> resolution app monitoring today. Free.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-11 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1334030557-24170-1-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
[not found] ` <4F853592.1010407@cn.fujitsu.com>
2012-04-11 8:27 ` Kang Kai [this message]
2012-04-11 8:34 ` [LTP] [PATCH] mq_timedreceive:5-2: reduce the timeout to be compared Wanlong Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F85407A.9050204@windriver.com \
--to=kai.kang@windriver.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.