From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?5p6X5b2l5L2R?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Input: Elan HID-I2C device driver Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:09:03 +0800 Message-ID: <4F85583F.6050008@emc.com.tw> References: <1334061766-20577-1-git-send-email-tom_lin@emc.com.tw> <20120411071212.GB6894@core.coreip.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120411071212.GB6894@core.coreip.homeip.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, djkurtz@chromium.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org Hi Daniel On 04/11/2012 03:12 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:42:46PM +0800, Tom Lin wrote: >> This patch adds driver for Elan I2C touchpad. These protocol of HID-I2C was >> defined by Microsoft. The kernel driver would use the multi-touch protocol >> format B. >> > > If this device truly supports HID protocol shouldn't we define i2c-hid > transport, similar to usbhid? I merely follow defined by Microsoft. It was called "HID OVER I2C" by Microsoft. (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/hh825917(v=vs.85).aspx) But I agree to change from hid i2c to i2chid. Do you have any better opinions? > > Thanks. >