From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4F85B869.2060102@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:59:21 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F7555F7.6010102@domain.hid> <4F75B5BF.8030401@domain.hid> <4F75C7D1.4020808@domain.hid> <4F79D5EA.3010501@domain.hid> <4F7D7A43.4060502@domain.hid> <4F8592F3.6070907@domain.hid> <4F85B7BE.9080706@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4F85B7BE.9080706@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Cross-link.c ---RTSER_RTIOC_WAIT_EVENT List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Wolfgang Grandegger Cc: xenomai-help On 04/11/2012 06:56 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 04/11/2012 04:19 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 04/05/2012 02:46 PM, Minh GIANG wrote: >>> i'm sorry sir, what i displayed just in the last mail, isn't good, because >>> i removed rt_dev_ioctl(...) in cross-link program >>> And then, with rt_dev_ioctl( RTSER_RTIOC_WAIT_EVENT ). >>> >>> [93076.465077] base=0x2f8 iir=0x4 >>> [93076.465082] base=0x2f8 status=0x0 >>> [93076.465084] base=0x2f8 iir=0x1 >> >> TX on rtser0: >> >>> [93076.556794] base=0x3f8 iir=0x2 >>> [93076.556799] base=0x3f8 status=0x0 >>> [93076.556801] base=0x3f8 iir=0x1 >> >> RX of 8 chars on rtser1: >> >>> [93076.557819] base=0x2f8 iir=0x4 >>> [93076.557823] base=0x2f8 status=0x0 >>> [93076.557825] base=0x2f8 iir=0x1 >> >>> [93076.558860] base=0x2f8 iir=0x4 >>> [93076.558865] base=0x2f8 status=0x0 >>> [93076.558867] base=0x2f8 iir=0x1 >> >>> [93076.559898] base=0x2f8 iir=0x4 >>> [93076.559901] base=0x2f8 status=0x0 >>> [93076.559903] base=0x2f8 iir=0x1 >> >>> [93076.560943] base=0x2f8 iir=0x4 >>> [93076.560946] base=0x2f8 status=0x0 >>> [93076.560948] base=0x2f8 iir=0x1 >> >>> [93076.561969] base=0x2f8 iir=0x4 >>> [93076.561971] base=0x2f8 status=0x0 >>> [93076.561973] base=0x2f8 iir=0x1 >> >>> [93076.563006] base=0x2f8 iir=0x4 >>> [93076.563009] base=0x2f8 status=0x0 >>> [93076.563011] base=0x2f8 iir=0x1 >> >>> [93076.564012] base=0x2f8 iir=0x4 >>> [93076.564012] base=0x2f8 status=0x0 >>> [93076.564012] base=0x2f8 iir=0x1 >> >>> [93076.564012] base=0x2f8 iir=0x4 >>> [93076.564012] base=0x2f8 status=0x0 >>> [93076.564012] base=0x2f8 iir=0x1 >> >> TX on rtser0: >> >>> [93076.656766] base=0x3f8 iir=0x2 >>> [93076.656770] base=0x3f8 status=0x0 >>> [93076.656772] base=0x3f8 iir=0x1 >> >> RX on rtser1: >> >>> [93076.657793] base=0x2f8 iir=0x4 >>> [93076.657795] base=0x2f8 status=0x0 >>> [93076.657797] base=0x2f8 iir=0x1 >> >> ... and so on. >> >> This looks completely normal and I'm really puzzled why the >> rt_dev_ioctl(RTSER_RTIOC_WAIT_EVENT) does not work as expected. Ah, I >> just realized that the following patch was not yet applied: >> >> https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-core/2011-11/msg00009.html >> >> I think it will fix your problem. > > Sorry, it looks like I completely forgot this patch. Could you rebase it > on the current contents of xenomai-2.6 so that I can merge it? > Actually, the patches are merged in xenomai-2.6 repository. The problem we have is simply that xenomai 2.6.0 is too old. -- Gilles.