All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dramatic I/O slowdown after upgrading 2.6.38->3.0+
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:19:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F85BD2F.80905@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F855173.40902@msgid.tls.msk.ru>

On 04/11/2012 04:40 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 10.04.2012 19:13, Jan Kara wrote:
>> > On Tue 10-04-12 10:00:38, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> []
>>> >>   2.6.38:
>>> >>   # dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null bs=1M iflag=direct count=100
>>> >>   100+0 records in
>>> >>   100+0 records out
>>> >>   104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 1.73126 s, 60.6 MB/s
>>> >>
>>> >>   3.0:
>>> >>   # dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null bs=1M iflag=direct count=100
>>> >>   100+0 records in
>>> >>   100+0 records out
>>> >>   104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 29.4508 s, 3.6 MB/s
>>> >>
>>> >> That's about 20 times difference on direct read from the
>>> >> same - idle - device!!
>> >   Huh, that's a huge difference for such a trivial load. So we can rule out
>> > filesystems, writeback, mm. I also wouldn't think it's IO scheduler but
>> > you can always check by comparing dd numbers after
>> >   echo none >/sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler

Did you try newer 3.X kernels or just 3.0?

We were hitting a similar problem with iscsi. Same workload and it
started with 2.6.38. I think it turned out to be this issue:

// thread with issue like what we hit:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1244680

// Patch that I think fixed issue:
commit 3deaa7190a8da38453c4fabd9dec7f66d17fff67
Author: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Date:   Fri Feb 3 15:37:17 2012 -0800

    readahead: fix pipeline break caused by block plug

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-11 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-30 16:50 dramatic I/O slowdown after upgrading 2.6.32->3.0 Michael Tokarev
2012-04-02 16:58 ` Jonathan Corbet
2012-04-05 23:29 ` Jan Kara
2012-04-06  4:45   ` Michael Tokarev
2012-04-10  2:26     ` Dave Chinner
2012-04-10  6:00       ` dramatic I/O slowdown after upgrading 2.6.38->3.0+ Michael Tokarev
2012-04-10 15:13         ` Jan Kara
2012-04-10 19:25           ` Suresh Jayaraman
2012-04-10 19:51             ` Jan Kara
2012-04-11  0:20           ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-04-11  9:40           ` Michael Tokarev
2012-04-11 17:19             ` Mike Christie [this message]
2012-04-11 17:55               ` Michael Tokarev
2012-04-11 18:28               ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F85BD2F.80905@cs.wisc.edu \
    --to=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.