From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Knut Petersen Subject: Re: bo problem, file-max limit reached within two days Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:50:32 +0200 Message-ID: <4F86CF98.5080006@t-online.de> References: <4F79651C.7050407@t-online.de> <1333356312_198045@CP5-2952> <4F868A5F.6070502@t-online.de> <20120412080352.GD3705@phenom.ffwll.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailout08.t-online.de (mailout08.t-online.de [194.25.134.20]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F4CA0A84 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:50:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120412080352.GD3705@phenom.ffwll.local> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Daniel Vetter Cc: intel-gfx List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Am 12.04.2012 10:03, schrieb Daniel Vetter: > Can you try the drm-intel-next-queued branch from my git repo at http://c= git.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel/ That contains a patch from Chris Wil= son to mitigate mmio offset exhaustion, one possible reason for a -ENOSPC f= ailure. -Daniel = It=B4s a short time for a test, but drm-intel-next-queued does not look bet= ter than other kernels: date; cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr; cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_gem_obje= cts Do 12. Apr 13:21:50 CEST 2012 9323 0 204854 1275 objects, 81797120 bytes 1251 [1251] objects, 84410368 [84410368] bytes in gtt 19 [19] active objects, 11051008 [11051008] bytes 2 [2] pinned objects, 5373952 [5373952] bytes 1230 [1230] inactive objects, 67985408 [67985408] bytes 0 [0] freed objects, 0 [0] bytes 3 pinned mappable objects, 13762560 bytes 786 fault mappable objects, 16318464 bytes 268435456 [268435456] gtt total Do 12. Apr 14:09:41 CEST 2012 12387 0 204854 4317 objects, 82264064 bytes 4282 [4282] objects, 84713472 [84713472] bytes in gtt 15 [15] active objects, 11304960 [11304960] bytes 2 [2] pinned objects, 5373952 [5373952] bytes 4265 [4265] inactive objects, 68034560 [68034560] bytes 0 [0] freed objects, 0 [0] bytes 3 pinned mappable objects, 13762560 bytes 3809 fault mappable objects, 27975680 bytes 268435456 [268435456] gtt total Do 12. Apr 14:47:18 CEST 2012 15616 0 204854 7015 objects, 148389888 bytes 905 [905] objects, 73834496 [73834496] bytes in gtt 15 [15] active objects, 11304960 [11304960] bytes 2 [2] pinned objects, 5373952 [5373952] bytes 888 [888] inactive objects, 57155584 [57155584] bytes 0 [0] freed objects, 0 [0] bytes 3 pinned mappable objects, 13762560 bytes 699 fault mappable objects, 13668352 bytes 268435456 [268435456] gtt total Files, total number of objects, inactive objects and fault mappable objects= raise at a rate comparable to kernels 3.3.1, 3.2.* and 3.1*. I searched about 15 months of log files - both error messages appeared for = the first time about 14 days ago. Kernel 3.2 is much older, and the system survived _much_ longer uptimes pre= viously. Either it=B4s not a kernel problem, or that kernel problem is exposed by some recent (max 6 weeks) change in Xo= rg, KDE, ... etc. Unfortunately there were a lot of changes in that time. cu, Knut