From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Cousson, Benoit" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: Remove un-used control module headers and defines. Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:57:08 +0200 Message-ID: <4F86D124.8050405@ti.com> References: <1330338743-24097-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <4F86AF0C.5060806@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:35496 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757496Ab2DLM5Q (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:57:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4F86AF0C.5060806@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Santosh Shilimkar Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi Santosh, On 4/12/2012 12:31 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > Benoit, > > On Monday 27 February 2012 04:02 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> Most of the OMAP4 control module register defines are not used and >> can be removed. Keep only needed defines and move them to common >> control module header just like other OMAP versions. >> >> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar >> --- > > What do you think about this patch ? I'm fine with it. I'm just wondering if we have to send it right now or along with the control module driver implementation we've just started. Regards, Benoit From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:57:08 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: Remove un-used control module headers and defines. In-Reply-To: <4F86AF0C.5060806@ti.com> References: <1330338743-24097-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <4F86AF0C.5060806@ti.com> Message-ID: <4F86D124.8050405@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Santosh, On 4/12/2012 12:31 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > Benoit, > > On Monday 27 February 2012 04:02 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> Most of the OMAP4 control module register defines are not used and >> can be removed. Keep only needed defines and move them to common >> control module header just like other OMAP versions. >> >> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar >> --- > > What do you think about this patch ? I'm fine with it. I'm just wondering if we have to send it right now or along with the control module driver implementation we've just started. Regards, Benoit