From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Ian Abbott <ian.abbott@mev.co.uk>,
"devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
Gerard Snitselaar <dev@snitselaar.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"fmhess@users.sourceforge.net" <fmhess@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: comedi: resolve section mismatch in s626
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:03:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F86D294.3050108@mev.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120410182438.GB2052@kroah.com>
On 2012/04/10 07:24 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:48:54AM +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
>> On 2012-03-19 23:26, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 03:46:49PM -0700, Gerard Snitselaar wrote:
>>>> I looked at this a bit more. It looks like they lose visibility to the
>>>> pci_dev structure.
>>>>
>>>> *_probe()
>>>> comedi_pci_auto_config() pci_dev
>>>> comedi_auto_config() pci_dev->dev
>>>> comedi_device_attach() ??
>>>> driv->attach() ??<= iterate through pci devices.
>>>>
>>>> Most of the examples I have looked at so far use for_each_pci_dev() to
>>>> find the device, and s626 shortcuts it a bit by directly making calls
>>>> to pci_get_subsys() with specific ids. They all verify they have the
>>>> right device by checking the bus and slot that are grabbed from the
>>>> pci_dev in comedi_pci_auto_config() and passed down.
>>>
>>> Ugh, surely there's a way to keep the pci dev through the
>>> comedi_device_attach() call, right?
>>
>> comedi_device_attach() is also called for the COMEDI_DEVCONFIG ioctl
>> for "manually" configuring a comedi device, and that has no idea
>> about struct pci_dev, etc.
>>
>> I recently posted a series of patches that allows lower-level comedi
>> drivers to supply separate hooks for auto-configuring PCI devices or
>> USB devices without abusing the old "manual configuration" code
>> paths, see <http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-March/025331.html>.
>>
>> The old loop that searches the PCI bus is still needed for the
>> "manual configuration" code path.
>
> So, now that I've applied your patches, this patch isn't needed anymore,
> right? Or should it be reworked to use the new interfaces?
I think it's still needed as that the comedi_driver->attach() hook is
still needed to support manual configuration by the COMEDI_DEVCONFIG
ioctl, and the existing code really shouldn't be looking in
s626_pci_table[] as it's tagged __devinitconst.
I never saw any mismatched section warnings when I compiled a linux-next
kernel on my system with a full set of comedi drivers, even with
CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH configured. I'm not sure why not, unless
it has something to do with me building the kernel with a separate build
directory.
The new comedi_driver->attach_pci() hook should be implemented for this
driver as well, and it's on my "todo" list (in my head!).
--
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbotti@mev.co.uk> )=-
-=( Tel: +44 (0)161 477 1898 FAX: +44 (0)161 718 3587 )=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-12 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-19 2:25 [PATCH] staging: comedi: resolve section mismatch in s626 Gerard Snitselaar
2012-03-19 3:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Gerard Snitselaar
2012-03-19 16:31 ` Greg KH
2012-03-19 16:43 ` Gerard Snitselaar
2012-03-19 22:46 ` Gerard Snitselaar
2012-03-19 23:26 ` Greg KH
2012-04-02 10:48 ` Ian Abbott
2012-04-10 18:24 ` Greg KH
2012-04-10 19:24 ` Gerard Snitselaar
2012-04-12 13:03 ` Ian Abbott [this message]
2012-04-18 23:28 ` Greg KH
2012-04-20 1:34 ` Gerard Snitselaar
2012-04-20 15:33 ` Greg KH
2012-04-24 1:30 ` [PATCH v2 resend] " Gerard Snitselaar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F86D294.3050108@mev.co.uk \
--to=abbotti@mev.co.uk \
--cc=dev@snitselaar.org \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=fmhess@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ian.abbott@mev.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.