From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SINh9-0002xd-H7 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:20:31 +0200 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3CHB5hn019644 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:11:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msp-dhcp21.wrs.com (172.25.34.21) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:11:05 -0700 Message-ID: <4F870CA8.9070709@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:11:04 -0500 From: Mark Hatle Organization: Wind River Systems User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Sakoman References: <1334179880.31685.12.camel@ted> <4F85FACB.8080205@windriver.com> <4F86F8D2.2050402@windriver.com> <1334246884.7309.40.camel@ted> In-Reply-To: Cc: Patches, discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] package_rpm: Fix useradd preinst ordering issues X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:20:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 4/12/12 12:06 PM, Steve Sakoman wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > >> For what its worth, bash here does Provides: /bin/sh so I'm a little >> puzzled about what is going on here. If its not doing that, it would >> certainly cause the error you're reporting... > > Hmm . . . while I see: > > Provides: /bin/sh > > in bash.spec, it is a different story in the pkgdata/runtime files. > > busybox has: > > FILERPROVIDES_/bin/busybox_busybox: /bin/sh > > > While bash doesn't have a FILERPROVIDES entry at all. > > Could this be why rpm doesn't realize bash provides /bin/sh? They should both be equally valid for the purpose of dependency resolution. --Mark > Steve