All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Cc: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Subject: Re: PM related performance degradation on OMAP3
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:05:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F87276F.6070504@mlbassoc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877gxk962e.fsf@ti.com>

On 2012-04-12 12:08, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Gary Thomas<gary@mlbassoc.com>  writes:
>
>> On 2012-04-12 10:57, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> +Felipe for EHCI question
>>>
>>> Gary Thomas<gary@mlbassoc.com>   writes:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> This worked a treat, thanks.  My network performance is better
>>>> now, but still not what it was.  The same TFTP transfer now takes
>>>> 71 seconds, so about 50% slower than on the 3.0 kernel.  Applying the
>>>> second [unnamed] patch (arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c) made no difference.
>>>
>>> And does a CONFIG_PM=n kernel get you back to your v3.0 performance?
>>
>> Correct.
>>
>
> OK, I just tried your TFTP experiment on a 3530/Overo board with the
> same smsc911x NIC that has GPIO interrupts, and I don't see much
> difference between a PM-enabled v3.0 and a PM-enabled v3.3.
>
> Are you TFTP'ing the file to an MMC filesystem?    Can you try to a
> ramdisk[1]?  If you're using MMC, it could be MMC driver changes since
> v3.0 that are actually causing your performance hit.

I'm testing to a ramdisk, so we're on the same page.

Could you send me your config file so I can compare?  Maybe I have something
"dumb" in my settings that aggravates things.

Also, what's your performance on 3.4-rc2?  The linux-media tree I started
from is a bit post v3.3, so there might be something else causing this.

>
> In my experiment, I TFTP'd a 24Mb file to a ramdisk, to make sure no
> other drivers were invovled, and didn't see any major differences
> between v3.0, v3.3, and v3.3 CONFIG_PM disabled.
>
> Below are my results.  As you can see, all the results seem to be pretty
> close to the same.  This test was not on a controlled, isolated network,
> so the differences are probably explained by other network activity:
>
> - v3.0 vanilla: PM enabled, CPUidle enabled
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 35.5 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 44.9 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 49.0 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 36.2 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 56.3 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 65.2 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 37.0 seconds
>
> - v3.3: PM enabled, CPUidle enabled
>   + GPIO fix (my for_3.4/fixes/gpio branch)
>   + smsc911x regulator boot fix (Tony's omap/fix-smsc911x-regulator branch)
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 32.1 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 29.8 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 33.5 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 44.5 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 39.2 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 57.0 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 49.6 seconds
>
> - v3.3: CONFIG_PM=n + branches above
>   + fix from Grazvydas for !CONFIG_PM case: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: sram: fix BUG in dpll code for !PM case
>   + disable CONFIG_OMAP_WATCHDOG which fails to boot when CONFIG_PM=y
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 34.1 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 33.9 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 34.9 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 37.8 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 40.0 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 37.6 seconds
>    - Received 25362406 bytes in 34.4 seconds
>
>
> Kevin
>
> [1] simple steps to make a ramdisk
> mkfs.ext2 /dev/ram0
> mkdir /tmp/rd
> mount /dev/ram0 /tmp/rd
> cd /tmp/rd
> <then TFTP file here>

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-12 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-06 22:50 PM related performance degradation on OMAP3 Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-04-09 19:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-11  0:29   ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-04-12  0:19     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-13 17:32       ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-04-13 19:32       ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-04-17 14:30         ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-17 21:50           ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-04-18  0:36             ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-24  9:50           ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-24 10:38             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-04-24 12:21               ` Tero Kristo
2012-04-24 12:50                 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-24 13:04                   ` Tero Kristo
2012-04-24 14:29             ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-01 14:10               ` Jean Pihet
2012-05-01 17:27                 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-02  5:59                   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-05-02 19:46                   ` Jean Pihet
2012-05-07 17:31                     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-09 11:00                       ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-12 23:02     ` Woodruff, Richard
2012-04-11 14:59 ` Gary Thomas
2012-04-11 17:23   ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-04-11 18:20     ` Gary Thomas
2012-04-11 19:17   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-12 10:44     ` Gary Thomas
2012-04-12 14:14       ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-12 15:28         ` Gary Thomas
2012-04-12 16:57           ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-12 17:10             ` Gary Thomas
2012-04-12 18:08               ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-12 19:05                 ` Gary Thomas [this message]
2012-04-12 22:03                   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-13  0:39                     ` Gary Thomas
2012-04-13  9:13             ` Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F87276F.6070504@mlbassoc.com \
    --to=gary@mlbassoc.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=notasas@gmail.com \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.