From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/16] KVM: MMU: introduce mmu_spte_establish
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:10:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F87FB8B.5010205@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F87FA69.5060106@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
It is used to establish the spte if it is not present to cleanup the
code, it also marks spte present before linking it to the sp's
parent_list, then we can integrate the code between rmap walking and
parent_lisk walking in the later patch
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 16 ++++------
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 151fcddc..aee13c6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1368,9 +1368,6 @@ static unsigned kvm_page_table_hashfn(gfn_t gfn)
static void mmu_page_add_parent_pte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *parent_pte)
{
- if (!parent_pte)
- return;
-
pte_list_add(vcpu, parent_pte, &sp->parent_ptes);
}
@@ -1401,7 +1398,6 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
list_add(&sp->link, &vcpu->kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages);
bitmap_zero(sp->slot_bitmap, KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM);
sp->parent_ptes = 0;
- mmu_page_add_parent_pte(vcpu, sp, parent_pte);
kvm_mod_used_mmu_pages(vcpu->kvm, +1);
return sp;
}
@@ -1765,12 +1761,8 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (sp->unsync && kvm_sync_page_transient(vcpu, sp))
break;
- mmu_page_add_parent_pte(vcpu, sp, parent_pte);
- if (sp->unsync_children) {
+ if (sp->unsync_children)
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_MMU_SYNC, vcpu);
- kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp);
- } else if (sp->unsync)
- kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp);
__clear_sp_write_flooding_count(sp);
trace_kvm_mmu_get_page(sp, false);
@@ -1797,6 +1789,35 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return sp;
}
+static void link_shadow_page(u64 *sptep, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+{
+ u64 spte;
+
+ spte = __pa(sp->spt) | PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_WRITABLE_MASK |
+ shadow_user_mask | shadow_x_mask | shadow_accessed_mask;
+
+ mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
+}
+
+static struct kvm_mmu_page *
+mmu_spte_establish(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte, gfn_t gfn, gva_t gaddr,
+ unsigned level, int direct, unsigned access)
+{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
+
+ WARN_ON(is_shadow_present_pte(*spte));
+
+ sp = kvm_mmu_get_page(vcpu, gfn, gaddr, level, direct, access, spte);
+
+ link_shadow_page(spte, sp);
+ mmu_page_add_parent_pte(vcpu, sp, spte);
+
+ if (sp->unsync_children || sp->unsync)
+ kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp);
+
+ return sp;
+}
+
static void shadow_walk_init(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator,
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr)
{
@@ -1846,16 +1867,6 @@ static void shadow_walk_next(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator)
return __shadow_walk_next(iterator, *iterator->sptep);
}
-static void link_shadow_page(u64 *sptep, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
-{
- u64 spte;
-
- spte = __pa(sp->spt) | PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_WRITABLE_MASK |
- shadow_user_mask | shadow_x_mask | shadow_accessed_mask;
-
- mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
-}
-
static void drop_large_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep)
{
if (is_large_pte(*sptep)) {
@@ -1921,11 +1932,6 @@ static void kvm_mmu_page_unlink_children(struct kvm *kvm,
mmu_page_zap_pte(kvm, sp, sp->spt + i);
}
-static void kvm_mmu_put_page(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *parent_pte)
-{
- mmu_page_remove_parent_pte(sp, parent_pte);
-}
-
static void kvm_mmu_unlink_parents(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
u64 *sptep;
@@ -2511,7 +2517,6 @@ static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t v, int write,
bool prefault)
{
struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator iterator;
- struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
int emulate = 0;
gfn_t pseudo_gfn;
@@ -2532,16 +2537,9 @@ static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t v, int write,
base_addr &= PT64_LVL_ADDR_MASK(iterator.level);
pseudo_gfn = base_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- sp = kvm_mmu_get_page(vcpu, pseudo_gfn, iterator.addr,
- iterator.level - 1,
- 1, ACC_ALL, iterator.sptep);
- if (!sp) {
- pgprintk("nonpaging_map: ENOMEM\n");
- kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
-
- link_shadow_page(iterator.sptep, sp);
+ mmu_spte_establish(vcpu, iterator.sptep, pseudo_gfn,
+ iterator.addr, iterator.level - 1,
+ 1, ACC_ALL);
}
}
return emulate;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
index df5a703..e3cf43b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -503,8 +503,9 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
sp = NULL;
if (!is_shadow_present_pte(*it.sptep)) {
table_gfn = gw->table_gfn[it.level - 2];
- sp = kvm_mmu_get_page(vcpu, table_gfn, addr, it.level-1,
- false, access, it.sptep);
+ sp = mmu_spte_establish(vcpu, it.sptep, table_gfn,
+ addr, it.level-1, false,
+ access);
}
/*
@@ -513,9 +514,6 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
*/
if (FNAME(gpte_changed)(vcpu, gw, it.level - 1))
goto out_gpte_changed;
-
- if (sp)
- link_shadow_page(it.sptep, sp);
}
for (;
@@ -533,9 +531,8 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
direct_gfn = gw->gfn & ~(KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(it.level) - 1);
- sp = kvm_mmu_get_page(vcpu, direct_gfn, addr, it.level-1,
- true, direct_access, it.sptep);
- link_shadow_page(it.sptep, sp);
+ mmu_spte_establish(vcpu, it.sptep, direct_gfn, addr, it.level-1,
+ true, direct_access);
}
clear_sp_write_flooding_count(it.sptep);
@@ -548,7 +545,8 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
out_gpte_changed:
if (sp)
- kvm_mmu_put_page(sp, it.sptep);
+ drop_parent_pte(sp, it.sptep);
+
kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
return NULL;
}
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-13 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-13 10:05 [PATCH v2 00/16] KVM: MMU: fast page fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:09 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] KVM: MMU: cleanup __direct_map Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:10 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-04-13 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] KVM: MMU: properly assert spte on rmap walking path Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-14 2:15 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-16 3:26 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] KVM: MMU: return bool in __rmap_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-14 2:00 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-15 11:25 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-16 14:14 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-16 14:28 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-16 15:54 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-13 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] KVM: MMU: abstract spte write-protect Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-14 2:26 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-16 3:27 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:12 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] KVM: VMX: export PFEC.P bit on ept Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:12 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] KVM: MMU: introduce for_each_pte_list_spte Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-14 2:44 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-16 3:36 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-17 14:47 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-18 4:01 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 1:01 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-21 4:36 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-18 10:03 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 1:03 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-13 10:13 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] KVM: MMU: store more bits in rmap Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:13 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] KVM: MMU: fast mmu_need_write_protect path for hard mmu Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:14 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] KVM: MMU: fask check whether page is writable Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-14 3:01 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-16 3:38 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-15 15:16 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-16 3:25 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-16 10:02 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-16 10:20 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-16 11:47 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-17 3:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-17 7:41 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-17 12:10 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:14 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] KVM: MMU: introduce SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE bit Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] KVM: MMU: introduce SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT bit Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] KVM: MMU: break sptes write-protect if gfn is writable Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] KVM: MMU: fast path of handling guest page fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-18 1:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-18 3:53 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-18 23:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-13 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] KVM: MMU: trace fast " Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] KVM: MMU: fix kvm_mmu_pagetable_walk tracepoint Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-14 3:37 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] KVM: MMU: fast page fault Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-16 3:50 ` Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F87FB8B.5010205@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.