From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4F882E7B.7010909@domain.hid>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:47:39 +0200
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4F50A422.50208@domain.hid> <4F560B76.5080606@domain.hid>
	<4F5629D2.50304@domain.hid>	<4F562B53.7070400@domain.hid>
	<4F562EC2.6040604@domain.hid>	<4F56387B.40702@domain.hid>
	<4F575BA3.7060404@domain.hid>	<4F576622.1030509@domain.hid>
	<4F57A567.7030008@domain.hid>	<4F7C127D.2010400@domain.hid>
	<4F7C1484.5090406@domain.hid>	<4F7C183F.5040009@domain.hid>
	<4F7F0D4E.8080906@domain.hid>	<4F7F0E8A.70702@domain.hid>
	<4F7F20F0.9070007@domain.hid>	<4F80BD10.2060200@domain.hid>
	<4F83F2C3.50704@domain.hid>	<4F83F321.2030300@domain.hid>
	<4F83F645.7040402@domain.hid> <4F83F828.4000508@domain.hid>
	<4F83F929.5000300@domain.hid> <4F83FBAB.7040301@domain.hid>
	<4F83FF49.90608@domain.hid> <4F840DD8.2030407@domain.hid>
	<4F841E32.50101@domain.hid> <4F8428AA.1040404@domain.hid>
	<4F842A4B.8040106@domain.hid> <4F852BBB.5050400@domain.hid>
	<4F85749C.808@domain.hid> <4F86AA98.6010805@domain.hid>
	<4F87099F.2020707@domain.hid> <4F87139E.6050805@domain.hid>
	<4F87E781.8020801@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <4F87E781.8020801@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] porting xenomai on imx25
List-Id: Xenomai life and development <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/options/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: Roberto Bielli <roberto.bielli@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org

On 04/13/2012 10:44 AM, Roberto Bielli wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
> 
> you don't feel like to repeat.
> I'm trying all the things that you told me and i will do all the missing 
> test that you told me.

So, what is the result of running your test with unpatched Linux, but
with CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS enabled?

> 
> And now this is the result of latency that i ran. It seems correct.

Is it with or without CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS?


-- 
                                                                Gilles.