From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: Remove un-used control module headers and defines. Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:04:37 +0530 Message-ID: <4F8BE7AD.2040505@ti.com> References: <1330338743-24097-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <4F86AF0C.5060806@ti.com> <4F86D124.8050405@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog132.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.250]:48842 "EHLO na3sys009aog132.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752511Ab2DPJen (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 05:34:43 -0400 Received: by obhx4 with SMTP id x4so8762023obh.8 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 02:34:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F86D124.8050405@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Cousson, Benoit" Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Thursday 12 April 2012 06:27 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > Hi Santosh, > > On 4/12/2012 12:31 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> Benoit, >> >> On Monday 27 February 2012 04:02 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> Most of the OMAP4 control module register defines are not used and >>> can be removed. Keep only needed defines and move them to common >>> control module header just like other OMAP versions. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar >>> --- >> >> What do you think about this patch ? > > I'm fine with it. I'm just wondering if we have to send it right now or > along with the control module driver implementation we've just started. > Let's do that as part of the driver implementation. Regards Santosh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:04:37 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: Remove un-used control module headers and defines. In-Reply-To: <4F86D124.8050405@ti.com> References: <1330338743-24097-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <4F86AF0C.5060806@ti.com> <4F86D124.8050405@ti.com> Message-ID: <4F8BE7AD.2040505@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 12 April 2012 06:27 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > Hi Santosh, > > On 4/12/2012 12:31 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> Benoit, >> >> On Monday 27 February 2012 04:02 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> Most of the OMAP4 control module register defines are not used and >>> can be removed. Keep only needed defines and move them to common >>> control module header just like other OMAP versions. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar >>> --- >> >> What do you think about this patch ? > > I'm fine with it. I'm just wondering if we have to send it right now or > along with the control module driver implementation we've just started. > Let's do that as part of the driver implementation. Regards Santosh