From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frank Rowand Subject: Re: osadl question .. stable version ? Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:15:26 -0700 Message-ID: <4F8DDD6E.4040709@am.sony.com> References: Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" To: Lars Segerlund Return-path: Received: from db3ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com ([213.199.154.142]:46758 "EHLO db3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751024Ab2DQVPo (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:15:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/17/12 13:31, Lars Segerlund wrote: > I know I have asked before, but osadl seem's stuck on 2.6.33 , quote : > > ' OSADL recommends the RT-Preempt realtime Linux kernel > 2.6.33.7.2-rt30 as latest stable version (Released on December 21, > 2010) ' > > Is this not misleading, I can't find the criteria for latest stable ? > > I am under the impression that there are some goodies in the 3.x > series, both general and RT that are nice, so sorry if I am asking in > the wrong forum but I just don't get this, ( with the version ), not a > biggie but looks odd, if one haven't followed rt for a while. > > / regards, Lars Segerlund. The answer about the criteria is at: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.rt.user/8115 -Frank