From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH] dtc: Basic integer expressions Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:52:13 -0600 Message-ID: <4F8E2C5D.2010202@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1333508160-7015-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <20120410022922.GE29577@game.jcrosoft.org> <4F83AF3D.6040903@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Jon Loeliger Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, "rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 04/10/2012 08:43 AM, Jon Loeliger wrote: >>> >>> can we update the kernel with it in next I'm goint to use it for at91 too >> >> Sure. >> >> Grant, >> >> Should I just port this individual patch, or pull in the whole of ToT >> dtc? I vaguely recall you advocating the latter sometime recently. > > We should wait and include the recently posted patch: > > From: Andrej Krutak > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rename _B to _XBYTE in libfdt_env.h. Oh, I see this actually is there already in upstream dtc, although the patch subject ended up being something different. In general, do you recommend just copying upstream dtc over the top of the kernel copy, or streaming in patches individually, or something else? Is there someone who usually does this; I see a lot of different committers to scripts/dtc in the kernel.