From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4F8E8578.3090905@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:12:24 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F8D5458.6070603@domain.hid> <4F8D553B.6010101@domain.hid> <4F8E7E35.6090402@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Understanding the output of hackbench when run together with xeno-test List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anisha Kaul Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On 04/18/2012 11:09 AM, Anisha Kaul wrote: > On 18 April 2012 14:11, Gilles Chanteperdrix > wrote: >> Try: xeno-test -l "dohell -b /home/anisha/Desktop/RealTime/downloadedPages/hackbench 14400" > > and that worked! I tried it with 2 seconds. You will not obtain the worst case latencies by running the test for 2 seconds, you have to let xeno-test run at least a few hours. > > I realize now that the problem is in the "parameters" which I specify > with hackbench: > > xeno-test -l "dohell -b > /home/anisha/Desktop/RealTime/downloadedPages/hackbench -pipe 100 > process 100 2" > > The sub `dohell` command (with hackbench parameters) work well, but it > doesn't work when attached with `xeno-test`. I remove the hackbench's > parameters ("-pipe 100 process 100"), then it starts working. > > Thanks for your help, but what should I do if I want those parameters? > Hardcoding them in the hackbench's code as a temporary solution? Or I > am still missing a point? As of now, the simplest way is to hardcode them in the dohell script. -- Gilles.